Suddenly, there is a thought that it might be stolen by North Korea.
1. Suspicion of Hacking Activities
1. The method of laundering coins is too ostentatious
- You mentioned that hackers laundered coins by issuing two meme coins (Qin Shi Huang and Terracotta Warrior). This method of laundering coins is too flamboyant and inconsistent with the secretive operational style of top hackers in the past.
- Normally, if it were indeed a top hacker's doing, they might adopt more complex and harder-to-trace methods to launder coins, in order to reduce the risk of being discovered. However, this operation seems relatively straightforward.
2. Doubts about the source of the original transaction fees
- The original transaction fees for the hacker's deployed contract were taken from Binance's coins, which is quite unreasonable. Logically speaking, a top hacker should handle the source of funds more cautiously to avoid leaving such obvious clues.
2. Legal Considerations
- The current situation is that although there are various signs pointing to the possibility of North Korea's involvement, these can only be speculations without actual evidence.
3. Speculation about the 'Scapegoat'
1. The general might be wronged
- The general might just be a 'scapegoat.' Given the general's character, he is unlikely to steal coins from Chinese people and humiliate them in such a way.
