Let's talk about a bold theory.

Right now, #KAITO is actually facing a severe test that could lead to some kind of negative feedback.

To put it bluntly, when you use #KAITO, you want to attract more people and convert more buyers. So the underlying logic to examine is the conversion rate or scale of buyers.

But this is a concept of total war. Simply put, if you give too many KOLs to #KAITO, it could lead to a 'relative deprivation' feeling among your basic community due to airdrops, which could shake their support. Then, if KOLs take the airdrops and become competitors, combined with the overall market sentiment being poor... then you could end up like a well-known parallel EVM project that starts with S, and with a TGE that could severely damage the community.

It’s possible that the next scenario is: the more popular #Kaito becomes, the more KOLs shout about the project, and the worse the FUD becomes.

Of course, many projects peak right after launching their tokens, so there's no particular expectation. Even KOLs of #KAITO can become a way to create a 'lao shu' cabin.

As @thecryptoskanda said, "One force can overcome ten meetings"—no matter how paralyzed your analysis is, as long as it goes up, it’s not a problem.

If it cannot "one force overcome ten meetings," then I can’t think of any method to solve that for now. However, I have always felt that @_kaitoai is a great Pareto evolution, and I hope they have innovative solutions.

If not, it’s actually not a big deal; the current version of the industry is universal PVP, and at worst, we welcome everyone to the era of full-chain PVP.

---

Actually, @thecryptoskanda has already explained @_kaitoai very thoroughly. You can go find his related #kaito posts yourself to see.

@thecryptoskanda is the true teacher and guide.

Hua Liu V God is the real V God.