The remarks made by Argentinian President Milei on a television program have sparked widespread controversy, especially regarding his tweet about the cryptocurrency LIBRA and its impact on investors. Milei admitted that he shared information about LIBRA in his tweet and emphasized that he did so out of goodwill and technological optimism. However, his statements also reveal a disregard for market volatility and investor risks, even suggesting that the primary affected parties are 'the Chinese and the Americans,' a statement that not only lacks a sense of responsibility but also carries evident bias.

Milei had previously claimed that his account was hacked, attempting to shirk responsibility, but this time he publicly acknowledged that the tweet was indeed from him, exposing his contradictory attitude. As the president of a country, his words and actions not only represent him personally but also relate to the national image and public trust. Nevertheless, Milei's statements show that his understanding of financial markets is overly simplistic, even neglecting the significant risks ordinary investors may face. He blamed 'professional volatility traders,' believing they 'understand the risks they take,' a statement that evidently ignores the serious consequences that market manipulation and information asymmetry may bring.

Furthermore, Milei's remarks reflect a lack of morality. He not only failed to apologize to those affected but also attempted to downplay the seriousness of the incident, even shifting the blame to the investors. This attitude is severely inconsistent with his self-proclaimed image as a 'fighter for free democracy,' raising questions about his leadership abilities and moral standards.

Overall, Milei's words and actions expose his ignorance in the financial field and his indifference to public responsibility. As president, he should treat his words and actions with greater caution, especially regarding issues involving financial markets and investor interests. This incident has not only damaged his personal credibility but also negatively impacted Argentina's international image.