Crawled 840,000 transaction transfers of Berachain between block heights 775,000 - 912,500, finding nearly 140,000 aggregation accounts.

Among these directly aggregated accounts (indirect aggregation not yet counted):

Accounts with more than 1,000 airdrop numbers: 22
Accounts with airdrop number range [100-1000]: 61
Accounts with airdrop number range [10-100]: 1,699
Accounts with only one airdrop number: 124,198

Clearly, this wave of airdrops has not resulted in a wealth creation movement for the general public, as most friends have been 'reaped' instead.

Among them, the top 5 aggregation accounts with the most airdrop numbers are:
0xe13b aggregated 6,906 airdrop numbers, totaling 26,891.32 bera
0x688 aggregated 6,894 airdrop numbers, totaling 32,715.04 bera
0x144 aggregated 5,223 airdrop numbers, totaling 31,122.46 bera
0x5a6 aggregated 5,037 airdrop numbers, totaling 19,753.14 bera
0xc34 aggregated 5,005 airdrop numbers, totaling 19,627.63 bera

0xb5f2e this account is quite unfortunate, aggregated 350 numbers, not even reaching a total of 1,000 coins.

0x0D0707963952f2fBA59dD06f2b425ace40b492Fe this account is somewhat special, directly aggregated 74 airdrop accounts, but the token amount reached 65,246.07

Additionally, there are 45 accounts that received less than 5 tokens from Genesis but aggregated over 100,000 tokens, and 128 accounts that aggregated less than 10 but exceeded 10,000 tokens. The tokens here should not only be allocated to testnet users; it's unknown how many of these are accounts of ecosystem developers or contributors.

The above data is directly aggregated from airdrop numbers and Genesis accounts, excluding indirect aggregation data.

Regarding whether there are insider trading issues with Berachain, it is difficult to draw conclusions due to unclear specific allocation rules (although this is a basic industry practice). However, looking at their allocation model, the allocation ratio for testnet users is very small; it feels like insider trading doesn't need to take from this share.


Note: The above data is only a preliminary statistic, without fine screening, and some data may be omitted or misjudged due to insufficient conditional judgment.