So let's assume that the team behind #TRUMP coins already knows that, according to this scenario, in the end, they will end up with tens of billions. Why not implement a more reasonable strategy to achieve hundreds of billions? For instance, the logic of first pushing up the market value and then offloading, especially in the early stages of the project when the team has enough celebrity effect (the newly elected president of the world's largest economy) and the market is highly enthusiastic. By controlling the supply and demand relationship of the circulating portion, they can push up the price, and when releasing the locked portion, the returns would be even greater. (Currently, 80% is locked, and only by increasing the circulating 20% can the locked 80% become more valuable.) As for the 80% of tokens that are locked, choosing an OTC offloading strategy is also feasible. Selling locked shares in the public market would have a direct impact on market prices, while off-exchange transactions can alleviate the selling pressure and ensure liquidity efficiency. Of course, the linear release after three months is an important observation period. If accompanied by favorable policies and market enthusiasm, the released tokens can be gradually absorbed by the market; however, if the release speed is too fast or market confidence is insufficient, the price is likely to collapse. Therefore, what we retail investors need to pay the most attention to is the risk nodes of the locked release (starting after three months) and whether the team will gradually offload amid favorable momentum, because funds can only be more effectively withdrawn during an upward trend.