In recent days, I have read a lot of community players' analysis of blockchain games. Before seeing a successful case, there is actually no empirical basis for what blockchain games should do. Now there are only lessons learned. Learning lessons does not mean that doing the opposite is the right way.
In addition, whether it is the players who have learned lessons, or the project parties, or the big players or the retail investors, from different perspectives, it is not certain who has been taught a lesson. Sometimes you are the nectar of mine.
Game assets are issued on the chain for players to trade freely, which means that the data cannot be rolled back after the operation of the chain game. Therefore, after the chain game is launched, there is no opportunity to do the opposite immediately if problems occur, because the transactions that have already occurred on the chain cannot be rolled back.
Therefore, the survival of the chain game is the greatest success, and I agree with this point. The listing of tokens is also an opportunity to revive, and there is still a narrative to tell in the next season.