A bit too fomo, some thoughts on brc20 inscription tokens:

1. The largest number of currency holding addresses in the BRC20 sector is sats currently at 40,000+. This number is neither big nor small, but it is real enough. I watched sats achieve it bit by bit, which is comparable to the existence of ordi.

2. At present, there is no doubt that all inscription tokens are "air". It is not wrong to speculate in air, but the number of players is a bit small, far less than the number of players in the NFT period. Purely relying on pulling people =cx=consensus?

3. Are there really no "big players" or "bankers" in these tokens? The answer is no, just break up the addresses. Like the erc20 native dog project party, we only see what others want us to see. .

4. As Binance gradually improves, I personally think Binance will make adjustments instead of the current okx way of playing. After all, Binance’s market share does not need to be completely copied. Maybe every meme needs to be empowered. , staking, ecology, etc. Let’s see where this wave of Binance can take the market!

5. Earnings of several times or more than ten times can be seen everywhere. To put it bluntly, it is the same as opensea. There is a valuation and a floor. Very few inscription tokens have sufficient liquidity. If this problem is not solved, then I think it will be a waste. It will be soon.