After discussing with friends who have joined the group in the past two days, the plan is as follows:

1. When I or everyone finds potentially good project information and wants to send it to the group, we cannot just provide the corresponding link, address, etc. You should also add your own analysis and judgment. Try to classify projects, such as S-level, A-level, B-level, C-level, etc. Among them, S-level projects are good in all aspects, and you can invest the most positions, and then go down in order. C-level projects may be the ones where you are likely to lose all your principal, or the amount is very small, but you can give it a try.

2. After the project is released, everyone should not just buy it directly. Everyone should also make judgments and discussions based on their own experience and perspective to see if the level needs to be adjusted. The main purpose here is to let everyone learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses, because everyone has their own shortcomings and blind spots, and they will not think comprehensively.

3. After everyone has a discussion. Each one will decide based on their own judgment and risk tolerance. For example, you can invest 1000u for S-level, 500u for A-level, 200 for B-level, and less than 50u for C-level. There is no real specific amount here, everyone can decide by themselves. If you feel that this project is not very reliable, although others think it may be A-level, but you think it is C-level, then it is right not to enter.

4. After the project is over, everyone will review the gains and losses of the project, what went wrong and what went right, and constantly improve the analysis framework. I'll do the review. Review records are only open to students in the group.

I think this may really feel a bit like the decision-making committee I mentioned earlier. Although it is a bit troublesome in the short term, if you persist for a long time, everyone who participates seriously should be able to gain something. This is also my original intention of establishing this group.

------------------------

Yesterday, a friend sent me the K-line charts of btc, eth and xxxy and asked me what I thought. I said that one of my current views is very certain, that is: the life cycle of small projects is the epitome of the big cycle of large projects. We need to practice deliberately, repeat many times, experience our own greed, anger and delusion in small projects, and then overcome a weakness on this project, and see how we fall into the same pit again on that project. . By repeating this many times, you can operate on the big mark without drifting and making fewer mistakes. Sweat more in peacetime and bleed less in wartime. I haven't fired a few bullets before going to the battlefield, and I want to suddenly hit the target with all my shots when I go to the battlefield. This is basically a fantasy.