#CKB助力比特币生态 $CKB and cfx, who can become the light of domestic products? It seems that ckb has a higher starting point, with a star team and institutional backing. However, cfx's popularity seems to be much higher, perhaps because I am also in the mining circle. The current gap between the two is not large, cfx is slightly ahead, and ckb can overtake with a surge in trading. So what makes cfx outpace others and is currently regarded by most as the light of domestic products? Personally, I believe it's not due to technology; both technologies appear impressive on the surface, but there aren't many applications. At this stage, technology cannot be said to be widely applied before large-scale implementation; it can only be described as flashy, a tool for promotion and profit-gathering. It is very likely that the difference is due to the different mining methods. Because ckb has a higher starting point, it released professional mining machines early, securing profits and locking in some users. Meanwhile, cfx has consistently adhered to GPU mining; without professional machines, it may have earned less money, but the community of GPU miners is much larger, which is more conducive to promotion and has established a more accessible image. However, after ckb transitioned to btc's L2, cfx is no longer in the same league. The light of domestic products will not be limited to one; I hope both ckb and cfx can work hard and become the light of domestic products. Everyone is welcome to leave their opinions in the comments.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.See T&Cs.