Token unlocking actually relies on "moral lock-up"?
I happened to see this news and it made me feel very emotional.
In the past few years, when I have been in the currency circle, I have often seen news about token unlocking disputes, abnormal circulation, etc.
Interestingly, when evaluating projects, many people will use information related to token economics such as the circulating market value, total number of tokens, etc. to judge whether to buy, sell, or invest.
As everyone knows, some projects will secretly modify the content of token economics, or sell the coins that should be locked up in the market in advance. After staying for a long time, it is really not surprising.
The traceability brought by blockchain should be a powerful tool to improve transparency, but in fact, there are so many "opaque" operations in the blockchain application market. How should the wild market be monitored and held accountable?
