Steve_Crypto0
--
$HMSTR have failed the community even after the biggest airdrop ?
$HMSTR airdrop has left a lot of the community feeling disappointed and betrayed, despite its unprecedented size. While distributing an airdrop to 131 million users is certainly an impressive feat, the lack of transparency throughout the process appears to have severely damaged trust.
Vesting being introduced unexpectedly, without prior mention, raises major concerns for many participants. This kind of surprise drastically impacts people's perception of the project's integrity. The poorly written white paper and apparent focus on monetizing user participation (through ads, YouTube, and other revenue streams) further fuel the belief that the project prioritized profit over community engagement.
It’s true that large-scale airdrops don’t guarantee long-term success, especially if there’s a disconnect between the project and its community. People invest their time and effort into these projects, expecting a fair and transparent process in return. Without that, the backlash is understandable, and as you pointed out, it's hard to see why anyone would want to engage in a potential second season.
With HMSTR down over 60% since launch, it’s clear hat market confidence has dropped alongside community sentiment. Projects like this must understand that community trust is paramount, especially in the long run. In this case, transparency could have prevented the loss of both credibility and value.
Restoring confidence will be an uphill battle for $HMSTR, and only time will tell if they can course correct. But for now, it seems like many participants feel let down.
#BinanceLaunchpoolHMSTR #EIGENonBinance #BTCPredictedNewATH #BTCReboundsAfterFOMC #NeiroOnBinance
$HMSTR airdrop has left a lot of the community feeling disappointed and betrayed, despite its unprecedented size. While distributing an airdrop to 131 million users is certainly an impressive feat, the lack of transparency throughout the process appears to have severely damaged trust.
Vesting being introduced unexpectedly, without prior mention, raises major concerns for many participants. This kind of surprise drastically impacts people's perception of the project's integrity. The poorly written white paper and apparent focus on monetizing user participation (through ads, YouTube, and other revenue streams) further fuel the belief that the project prioritized profit over community engagement.
It’s true that large-scale airdrops don’t guarantee long-term success, especially if there’s a disconnect between the project and its community. People invest their time and effort into these projects, expecting a fair and transparent process in return. Without that, the backlash is understandable, and as you pointed out, it's hard to see why anyone would want to engage in a potential second season.
With HMSTR down over 60% since launch, it’s clear hat market confidence has dropped alongside community sentiment. Projects like this must understand that community trust is paramount, especially in the long run. In this case, transparency could have prevented the loss of both credibility and value.
Restoring confidence will be an uphill battle for $HMSTR, and only time will tell if they can course correct. But for now, it seems like many participants feel let down.
#BinanceLaunchpoolHMSTR #EIGENonBinance #BTCPredictedNewATH #BTCReboundsAfterFOMC #NeiroOnBinance
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
81
0