Today I learned about the platform’s order-following system, and happened to see our order-taking activities. There are a few words that I don’t want to say out loud.

The copying system actually improves the effect of "reducing users' decision-making/operation costs", which can bring more trading volume to the platform. Although the final key indicator for performance evaluation of every exchange is "trading volume", I have rarely seen competitions that are only higher than trading volume. Trading volume is determined by principal/leverage/opening frequency. High trading volume will definitely provide more handling fees.

Did Binance’s activity operation this time only take into account the platform’s internal KPIs and not what users are thinking? The ranking of order trading volume can most likely directly determine who is the strongest person who can pay commissions (internally on this platform) Just watch it for yourself, users will have their nostrils turned upward when they see this)

Let me talk about a plan for exchanges to conduct ranking activities in the future, but the first data target is trading volume:

We can make a ranking based on the weighting of the comprehensive quality of the orders, such as rate of return * N + income * M + trading volume * Y, and the weight is tilted on the factor Y of trading volume. In this way, at least the traders selected in the future will be those with "strong overall quality" rather than those who "pay the most fees". Some activities really need to be more subtle, don’t you think so?