Objavi
Durefishan
·
--
something shifted in how i think about protocol revenue lately not the yield numbers, but what happens to fees before they reach holders.
i spent time last week going through bedrock's fee structure. not the APY dashboard. the actual mechanism underneath. BR is trading at $0.09 today. 60% down from its $0.26 ATH. $26.4M market cap. $350k daily volume. thin book.
community posts reference 20% of protocol income going to weekly buybacks. at current volume that's roughly $70k weekly buying pressure against $350k daily selling. do the math quietly.
but no on-chain transaction hash. no wallet address. no timestamp linked in official documentation. the claim exists. the verification doesn't.
Curve Finance runs the same model. veToken holders receive fee revenue. but Curve publishes weekly fee distributions with exact amounts and timing. you can verify every distribution on-chain without trusting the team.
bedrock's buyback promise sits in a different category right now. the mechanism is described. the execution isn't verifiable.
i'll be honest there's a version where buybacks are happening and i simply haven't found the right address. if bedrock publishes a verified buyback wallet with transaction history, this concern disappears entirely. but i've looked, and that link isn't publicly available yet.
the Binance Square campaign ends June 16. three days away. campaign volume disappears after that. $350k daily book gets thinner. fee revenue drops. buyback pressure already unverifiable becomes even harder to track.
this isn't about whether buybacks happen.
it's about whether a $26.4M market cap protocol can afford to keep the mechanism invisible when the campaign stops masking the silence.
not FUD. just watching the calendar.
have you ever tried to verify a protocol's buyback claims on-chain rather than taking the documentation at face value?
$BR #bedrock @Bedrock
i spent time last week going through bedrock's fee structure. not the APY dashboard. the actual mechanism underneath. BR is trading at $0.09 today. 60% down from its $0.26 ATH. $26.4M market cap. $350k daily volume. thin book.
community posts reference 20% of protocol income going to weekly buybacks. at current volume that's roughly $70k weekly buying pressure against $350k daily selling. do the math quietly.
but no on-chain transaction hash. no wallet address. no timestamp linked in official documentation. the claim exists. the verification doesn't.
Curve Finance runs the same model. veToken holders receive fee revenue. but Curve publishes weekly fee distributions with exact amounts and timing. you can verify every distribution on-chain without trusting the team.
bedrock's buyback promise sits in a different category right now. the mechanism is described. the execution isn't verifiable.
i'll be honest there's a version where buybacks are happening and i simply haven't found the right address. if bedrock publishes a verified buyback wallet with transaction history, this concern disappears entirely. but i've looked, and that link isn't publicly available yet.
the Binance Square campaign ends June 16. three days away. campaign volume disappears after that. $350k daily book gets thinner. fee revenue drops. buyback pressure already unverifiable becomes even harder to track.
this isn't about whether buybacks happen.
it's about whether a $26.4M market cap protocol can afford to keep the mechanism invisible when the campaign stops masking the silence.
not FUD. just watching the calendar.
have you ever tried to verify a protocol's buyback claims on-chain rather than taking the documentation at face value?
$BR #bedrock @Bedrock
Izjava o omejitvi odgovornosti: Vključuje mnenja tretjih oseb. Ne gre za nasvet. Binance AI se lahko uporablja brez jamstva. Glejte Pogoje.