Something I've been thinking about with @OpenLedger
Governance has a process. People don't.
If contributors notice a certain type of data earns more, they'll adjust right away. If builders feel a Datanet is getting worse, they'll look for alternatives right away.
Nobody pauses and says, "Let's wait two weeks for governance."
That's what makes this interesting.
The network is constantly learning from incentives. Every reward teaches a lesson. Every payout nudges behavior.
So if the incentives drift in the wrong direction, the real change happens long before any proposal gets voted on.
By the time governance catches up, people may have already changed how they contribute, build, and use the network.
That's why I don't think the biggest challenge is governance itself.
It's whether the correction can arrive before the network learns the wrong habit.