uselections

Currently, the President of United States of America, Joe Biden, has withdrawn from the election to be held in November 2024. Now it has to be seen who among them, Kamla Harris from the Democrat Party and Donald Trump, who is from the Republican Party, will win the election of 2024 November. Because recently a news has come that if Donald Trump wins the election then he will implement the PROJECT-2025 in America. It is being said that the PROJECT-2025 will bring dictatorship in America.
Project 2025: A wish list for a Trump presidency, explained
Ahead of each presidential election, many think tanks in Washington DC release policy wishlists. As the campaign heats up, these proposals can act as talking points for candidates, and perhaps even shape their official party platforms.
The Conservative Promise is one such policy wishlist, which lays out ambitious ideas for a prospective Trump presidency. It is published by Project 2025, which is “a broad coalition of conservative organisations that have come together to ensure a successful administration begins in January 2025”.
Project 2025 has also set up a personnel database which will help the future president make administrative appointments, a training programme to develop future conservative leaders, and “a 180-day playbook”, which presents a blueprint for the first six months of the next presidency.
“If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration. This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project,” the project’s website reads.
In popular discourse, Project 2025 has been used interchangeably with The Conservative Promise.
Why is Project 2025 controversial?
Simply put, Project 2025’s policy agenda takes some extreme positions.
It advocates expanding the president’s powers, and concentrating decision-making authority in the White House. Conversely, it argues for drastically reducing the power, and cutting the funding, of various federal administrative departments. Among its notable recommendations is to “disband” the Department of Education.Project 2025 calls for the reclassification of tens of thousands of federal workers — possibly the most dramatic change in the federal workforce since the 1880s. This will allow the president to appoint loyalists who side with him, and his administration.The policy document calls for a “biblically based” definition of marriage and family, which it clarifies means “heterosexual, intact marriage”. It also pushes a number of anti-LGBTQ+ positions, such as rescinding federal anti-discrimination protections “on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, and sex characteristics”.On reproductive rights, Project 2025 advocates the prosecution of people who send abortion pills through the mail, the cancellation of the Food and Drug Authority’s two-decade-old approval of mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in medication abortion, and the federal tracking of abortion-seekers using “every available tool”.The policy document recommends “unwinding… the Biden Administration’s climate fanaticism”. For example, it recommends ending wind and solar power subsidies, scrapping energy-efficiency standards for appliances, prioritising the use of fossils, and dismantling the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Clean Energy Corps.Project 2025 calls to expand on Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration during his previous term. For instance, it advocates for higher thresholds for accepting immigrants and refugees, and increasing the amount of time undocumented children can spend in the detention centres.
Who is behind Project 2025?
Project 2025 is spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a Washington DC-based conservative think tank. Heritage platforms researchers and analysts from a wide range of fields, who — according to the organisation’s website — seeks solutions to “protect America’s future”.
“From empowering parents in education, reversing growing spending and inflation, and protecting the unborn, to securing America’s borders, countering the threat of Communist China, holding Big Tech accountable, and ensuring free and fair elections — Heritage is on the front lines in the fight to help Americans thrive,” the foundation’s website says.
Heritage has been publishing the Mandate for Leadership series since 1981. Each publication coincides with a presidential election, and offers specific conservative policy recommendations for the federal government. From Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump, the Mandate series has been highly influential in guiding Republican presidents’ actions. According to Heritage’s website, Trump “embraced nearly two-thirds of Heritage’s proposals within just one year in office” including leaving the Paris Climate Accords, increasing military spending, and increasing off-shore drilling.
Project 2025 builds off Heritage’s Mandate series, collaborating with more than 100 other conservative organisations. These include the Center for Renewing America, a Christian nationalist policy think tank headed by Russel Vought; Moms for Liberty, which has vociferously advocated against school curricula that mention LGBTQ+ rights, race and ethnicity, critical race theory, and discrimination; and the National Rifle Association, gun rights lobbying and advocacy group.

Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

$BTC price guess for TOP :
As we navigate the ever-volatile cryptocurrency market, predicting the bull top for BTC has become a topic of much debate. While some analysts are calling for a $100,000+ peak, I firmly believe that the bull top for this cycle will reach a more conservative estimate of $85,000 to $90,000.
$ETH & $SOL TOP price :
Ethereum, on the other hand, is poised to reach $10,000, while Solana and Binance Coin will likely top out at $600 and $900, respectively. It's important to note that this cycle will not see the same level of altcoin frenzy as 2021, where seemingly every alternative asset experienced astronomical gains. Instead, only a select few will provide substantial returns.
#Memes & #NFT prediction :
Memes will continue to play a significant role in the market, with constant growth and pumping. Additionally, the NFT market is expected to experience a surge sooner than anticipated.
US Elections #uselections
Furthermore, the upcoming US election results will undoubtedly impact the market, adding an extra layer of uncertainty to the already unpredictable world of cryptocurrency.
In conclusion, while some may be calling for a $100,000+ bull top for BTC, I firmly believe that a more conservative estimate of $85,000 to $90,000 is in store for this cycle. As always, it's essential to stay informed and adapt to the ever-changing market landscape.
Note :
Please keep in mind that this is a speculative article and not investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry risks, and it's crucial to do your own research and consider your risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.
#BTCPricePredictions

Trump’s campaign has contingency plan for taking on HarrisHarris or other Democrats deprive Trump of age argument
Donald Trump, fresh off a convention where the Republican Party’s confidence in him was palpable, must now deal with a harsh reality: The 2024 race has gotten dramatically trickier to navigate with President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out.
Trump’s aides weren’t surprised by the exit on Sunday, and his campaign had been developing contingency plans to take on Vice President Kamala Harris since a disastrous performance by Biden in a late-June debate sparked calls for the president to abandon his reelection campaign.
Those plans, though, have to address some fresh challenges. For months, 78-year-old Trump has attacked 81-year-old Biden for being too old to effectively serve another term. But 59-year-old Harris — whom Biden has endorsed — or virtually every other Democrat who could end up atop the ticket would deprive Trump of the argument, and might even be able to turn the tables on him.
The campaign also risks losing traction with some key constituencies, including young people and voters of color, where it had made inroads with some who now might be receptive to Harris or another Democrat. One of the strategies Trump allies plan to employ against Harris — to paint her as less likable personally — holds particular risk of alienating suburban women and Black voters.
And while Trump has kneecapped rivals in the past with cutting insults and demeaning nicknames, his attacks on women candidates have sometimes veered into sexist or racist territory that threatens to turn some voters off. He has referred to Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas,” and called his Republican primary challenger Nikki Haley“birdbrain.”
A 2019 ad from Harris’ earlier presidential bid rocketed around social media over the weekend, offering a preview of how she might put Trump on the defensive: The spot dubbed Harris “the anti-Trump,” contrasting her background as a prosecutor with claims that Trump is “owned by the big banks.”

Immigration Focus
Trump allies and advisers have shrugged off Harris, appraising her as a weaker candidate than Biden who is worse at one-on-one interactions with everyday voters.
The campaign believes it can beat Harris by playing up her leading role tackling immigration policy in the Biden administration. Trump’s co-campaign manager, Chris LaCivita, has called Harris the “border czar,” and has said he would love to use that message against her. That description of her was used repeatedly at the Republican National Convention, hinting that the party views it as a potent attack.
Trump himself had prepared to potentially run against Harris. He outlined his thoughts on a Harris candidacy in an interview with Bloomberg on July 9, just days before a lone gunman attempted to assassinate him at a rally in Pennsylvania.
“I don’t think it would make much difference,” he said by phone. “I see the same basic level of competence, and I don’t think it would make much difference. I would define her in a very similar manner that I define” Biden.
Several polls since the debate have shown Harris trailing Trump either nationally or in key states. Some political strategists, though, don’t see that as predictive of how things will stack up if she is officially anointed the Democratic nominee. The party’s convention is set to begin Aug. 19 in Chicago.
David Axelrod, the former Obama White House adviser, said Sunday that the “election changed in a dramatic way” when Biden decided to stand down. Trump is “a vulnerable candidate and can be beaten,” Axelrod said on CNN.
Little Time
After Biden’s disastrous debate, Trump officials first made the argument that the incumbent had won nearly all of the Democratic delegates during the primary, and legally it was too late to shift them to another candidate.
That argument evolved over the week at the Republican National Convention. By Thursday, top officials like LaCivita publicly suggested that if Biden was too feeble to run for reelection, then he should not serve out the remainder of his term in the White House.
Now that Biden has made the decision, though, their focus is largely on figuring out how to best square off against his replacement. While the game plan is set for Harris, the plan for another potential Democrat is far murkier, said two people familiar with the campaign’s plans.
Two Trump advisers say the toughest presidential candidate to beat would be Michelle Obama, but there is no indication she would want to run and the former first lady has batted down any mention of a political career in the past.
The Democrats’ vice presidential nominee is also now a wild card. That complicates debate preparation for JD Vance, the Ohio senator just tapped as Donald Trump’s running mate.
And it has the potential to alter the ticket’s chances in key battleground states. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, an oft-mentioned name as a possible running mate for Harris, would complicate that state for the Republican, one Trump adviser says, but not push the swing state out of reach. Shapiro was quick to endorse Harris after Biden dropped out.
Trump allies and advisers privately think the sprint that Democrats are facing works in the GOP’s favor. The Democrats have very little time to coalesce behind a candidate and raise money before early voting starts in some states.

#kamalaHarris #uselections #donaldtrump

Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Last week’s prediction market trading volume surpassed previous records set during the U.S. presidential election, as reported by Dune Analytics through today News on October 21.

This surge in trading highlights increasing interest in prediction markets, potentially impacting cryptocurrency liquidity and indicating heightened market engagement, as platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket experience unprecedented volumes.

Record $1B Traded: Massive Market Engagement
Last week, Dune Analytics data indicated that prediction market trading volumes surpassed peaks observed during previous U.S. presidential election cycles. noted an unprecedented surge in user participation.
The record $1 billion in contracts traded highlights the growing engagement in regulated markets. Higher volumes suggest significant institutional interest, driven partly by CFTC approvals and community trust in these platforms.

Community reactions are centered around record-setting activities.

Volumes and engagement never before reached in regulated prediction markets.
This reflects broader market trends, emphasizing user involvement in politically relevant events.

USDC’s Stability Crucial Amid Trading Surge
Did you know The recent trading volume in prediction markets not only eclipsed the peaks of the 2020 U.S. election but also established a new standard for engagement in politically charged trading environments.#BTRPreTGE #USBankingCreditRisk #StrategyBTCPurchase #USBitcoinReservesSurge #uselections

The debate surrounding the 2024 U.S. election is heating up, with key issues like the economy, healthcare, immigration, and climate change taking center stage. Candidates from both parties are offering distinct visions for the future, with Republicans focusing on conservative values, economic growth, and border security, while Democrats emphasize social justice, healthcare access, and climate action.
Voter turnout and swing states are expected to play a pivotal role, as both sides rally their bases and attempt to sway undecided voters. The election is shaping up to be a reflection of the country's deep political divides, with implications for domestic and global policies.
#uselections #trump

According to Standard Chartered's latest report, Bitcoin ($BTC ) could surge to $125,000 by the end of the year if Donald Trump wins the U.S. presidential election, or reach $75,000 if Kamala Harris triumphs. While the outcome of the election is significant for digital assets, the bank believes Bitcoin will see new all-time highs either way, with Trump's presidency being more favorable for faster regulatory easing. However, under a Harris administration, regulatory progress, particularly around relaxing banking rules for digital assets, would continue but at a slower pace. Positive factors like a re-steepening U.S. Treasury curve are expected to support Bitcoin regardless of the election outcome.
#donaldtrump #kamalaHarris #uselections #PowellAtJacksonHole

it would mark a historic moment with wide-ranging implications. Here’s what might follow:
Historical Significance 🌍👩🏽‍⚖️
Kamala Harris would make history as the first female president and the first of Black and South Asian descent, a milestone that could spark increased diversity in American politics and leadership, inspiring future generations.Policy Continuity with Biden Administration 🔄📜
Harris is likely to continue much of the Biden administration’s policy agenda, including climate action, healthcare reforms, social equity, and infrastructure improvements. Her role as vice president has kept her closely aligned with these initiatives, so a Harris administration might bring consistency with a unique touch on key issues.Focus on Social Justice and Equity ⚖️💪🏾
With her background in civil rights, Harris might bring a stronger focus on criminal justice reform, women’s rights, and racial equity. We could see a push for police reform, expanded voting rights protections, and further efforts to address systemic inequalities.Global Relations and Foreign Policy 🌐🤝
Harris would likely maintain the Biden administration’s approach to foreign policy, including strengthening alliances, supporting NATO, and addressing geopolitical challenges posed by China and Russia. Her personal views, however, might influence diplomatic efforts, leading to nuanced shifts in U.S. relations worldwide.Economic and Environmental Policy 💼🌳
Harris is known for her commitment to green energy and environmental justice, so we might see further support for green jobs, carbon reduction initiatives, and sustainable practices. Her economic approach may emphasize middle-class growth, increased wages, and enhanced healthcare access, building a resilient economy.Political and Social Reactions ⚡📊
Like any administration, Harris’s presidency would evoke mixed reactions. While some view her leadership as progressive and long-awaited, others may find her policies too liberal, intensifying the polarization already present in U.S. politics.

Overall, a Kamala Harris presidency would represent a historic shift, likely maintaining many Biden-era initiatives while also advancing her own policy priorities in social justice, economic growth, and sustainability.

#uselections

In the immediate term, the focus is undeniably on the U.S. election, but in the bigger picture, the bullish trend for Bitcoin remains firmly intact. Right now, speculating on how a Trump or Harris administration might impact the market feels trivial, as the market sentiment in crypto is remarkably clear: Harris equals bearish pressure; Trump equals bullish support. That’s how it is for the near term. But in the long term? The answer seems obvious—Bitcoin’s path has historically been upward, election or no election. The established trend for Bitcoin has always been clear—long-term bullish, while the short-term remains highly reactive.

At present, there’s an important short-term factor—the U.S. election. In this election cycle, Harris is perceived as the "bearish candidate," while Trump is regarded as the "bullish figure." The market swings sharply each day based on the latest election updates, creating a tense and sometimes puzzling atmosphere. Many are left wondering whether these moves reflect Bitcoin’s genuine direction or if market players are merely exploiting the election hype to drive volatility.

Recently, I expressed a concern: with the ongoing election cycle favoring bearish developments for Harris, Bitcoin’s price has been slipping. Just yesterday, it dipped below 66,000, hinting at a possible downturn. Yet, behind the scenes, institutional investors and large players appear to be quietly capitalizing on this dip. This week alone, the net inflow for U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs hit $2.1 billion, with whales positioning for a potential bottom. What does this reveal? Could it all be part of a broader maneuver?

Based on Farside Investors data, the weekly net inflow for U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs indeed reached $2.1 billion, including inflows of $2.02 billion into BlackRock’s IBIT and $83.6 million into Fidelity’s FBTC. As this information circulated, it seems the broader market started recognizing these signs. Market sentiment has stabilized, and we witnessed no further sell-off but instead a robust rebound, with Bitcoin reclaiming close to the 69,000 range. This suggests that many believe Harris’s advantage isn’t enough of a reason to short, suspecting that market forces might be using election-related news to provoke hasty selling among retail investors.

When we pause and reflect on this rationally, the situation appears less intimidating. Over the long term, regardless of who secures the presidency, the potential for Bitcoin to continue appreciating remains strong. With a finite supply and deflationary nature, compounded by losses and inaccessible wallets, Bitcoin’s scarcity is likely to drive value higher. This is a long-term trajectory that’s difficult to disrupt.

If we think of the long term as strategy and the short term as tactics, then strategically, there’s little need to worry about a single election’s effect on Bitcoin’s broader trend. For those holding spot positions, the best approach may be to remain steady, minimize unnecessary moves, observe the market, and let time work in your favor as the dust settles, allowing Bitcoin to resume its historical trajectory.

However, even with this long-term confidence, it’s essential not to overlook short-term tactics. The election’s immediate impact on Bitcoin’s short-term price action is clear. Within crypto circles, Harris is seen as the “bearish candidate,” and as her odds fluctuate, Bitcoin’s price follows suit. If she wins, we could see a strong reaction, perhaps even a panic sell-off leading to a notable market downturn. On the other hand, a Trump win might put bearish traders in a challenging position.

From a tactical standpoint, this is especially relevant for those trading on margin. In this uncertain climate, a cautious approach is best—trade less, avoid heavy positions, and ensure sufficient margin. In volatile times like these, cash remains a powerful tool, offering flexibility and safety. How do you all see it?

#USElections2024Countdown #Elections2024 #uselections #BTCMiningRevenue

According to Polymarket data, Donald Trump’s chances of winning the 2024 U.S. presidential election against Kamala Harris have recently declined to 53.8%. This shift indicates that traders and political observers are less confident about Trump's victory as the race intensifies.

The betting odds, which often capture public sentiment, hint that Harris may be gaining ground as the election approaches. With only a slight lead for Trump, the competition looks tighter than anticipated and could go either way depending on evolving voter opinions.

As election day nears, these odds may shift further due to campaign events, debates, and changes in public perception. Polymarket's data underscores the uncertainty and high stakes of what promises to be a closely contested election.
$BTC
#USElections2024Countdown #USPCEExceeds #USEquitiesRebound #uselections #TetherAEDLaunch

#TrumpInCrypto #TrumpSupportsCrypto #uselections #MarketExperts #Marketsentimentstoday

Introduction
The election of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States in 2016 sent shockwaves through global financial markets. His unorthodox policies, nationalist rhetoric, and promise to "Make America Great Again" represented a shift away from the globalist trend. Investors, businesses, and governments around the world faced uncertainty about the potential impact on trade, immigration, and economic growth. This article delves into how Trump's victory influenced global markets, focusing on key areas such as stock markets, currencies, trade, and industry.

Stock Markets: The Initial Surge

U.S. Market Reaction
In the immediate aftermath of Trump's victory, the U.S. stock market surged. The Dow Jones Industrial Average soared to new heights, with financials, energy, and industrials leading the charge. Investors reacted positively to Trump's promises of deregulation, tax cuts, and infrastructure spending. The S&P 500 and NASDAQ followed suit, both experiencing substantial gains.

Why the Rally?
Trump’s pro-business agenda was the main catalyst. His administration pledged to reduce corporate taxes, leading to expectations of higher corporate earnings. Additionally, the promise of deregulation, particularly in the financial and energy sectors, raised hopes for more profitability in these industries.

Global Market Response
Global stock markets also experienced significant changes. European stocks rallied initially, particularly in industries like defense and pharmaceuticals, which were expected to benefit from Trump's policies. In contrast, emerging markets saw a more volatile reaction due to fears of trade disruptions and capital outflows.

Emerging Markets Impact
Trump’s protectionist stance on trade and threats to impose tariffs on imports from countries like China and Mexico caused concerns in emerging markets. Investors began pulling capital out of these markets, fearing that U.S. policies could stifle growth in these economies.

Currency Markets: A Dollar Surge and Global Ripples

The U.S. Dollar Spike
Following Trump’s victory, the U.S. dollar surged against most major currencies. Investors flocked to the dollar as a safe haven amidst the uncertainty. Expectations of future interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve further strengthened the greenback.

Impact on Global Trade
A stronger dollar made U.S. exports more expensive and less competitive in global markets. This created challenges for American manufacturers but also opportunities for foreign producers who could sell cheaper products to U.S. consumers

Effects on Emerging Market Currencies
Currencies in emerging markets, particularly those of Mexico and China, faced downward pressure as investors feared Trump’s trade policies could disrupt the global supply chain. The Mexican peso, in particular, saw a sharp decline due to Trump's promise to renegotiate NAFTA and impose tariffs on Mexican goods.

Trade and Industry: The Global Supply Chain Disruption

The Trump Tariffs and Trade Wars
One of the most significant impacts of Trump's presidency on global markets was his trade war with China. The imposition of tariffs on billions of dollars of Chinese goods sparked retaliatory tariffs from China on U.S. products. This not only affected the two largest economies but also sent ripples throughout the global supply chain.

Industries Hit Hard
Industries such as agriculture, technology, and automotive were hit particularly hard. U.S. farmers, for instance, faced decreased demand from China, a major importer of American soybeans and other agricultural products. Similarly, tech companies that relied on components from China faced rising costs, disrupting production and innovation.

Reconfiguring Supply Chains
Many companies began reconsidering their reliance on Chinese manufacturing due to the tariffs. This led to shifts in global supply chains, with some production moving to other Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia, which were seen as alternatives to China.

Impact on Global Economies

U.S. Economic Growth
Trump’s policies had a mixed impact on the U.S. economy. While the tax cuts led to short-term economic growth and a boost in corporate profits, the trade war with China caused uncertainty in the global markets, leading to slowdowns in investment and manufacturing.

Global Economic Slowdown
The trade war also contributed to a global economic slowdown. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank lowered global growth forecasts several times during Trump's presidency due to the uncertainty created by the trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

China’s Slowdown
China’s economic growth slowed as a result of the trade war, with exports to the U.S. decreasing and domestic consumption being affected by uncertainty. This slowdown in China had ripple effects on other economies, particularly those in Asia and Europe, that were heavily dependent on trade with China.

Conclusion: A Lasting Impact
The election of Donald Trump marked a significant turning point for global markets. While his pro-business policies initially sparked optimism in U.S. markets, his trade wars and protectionist stance caused significant disruption in global trade and investment. The impact of Trump’s presidency on global markets was characterized by volatility, with industries and economies around the world forced to adapt to a new, less predictable U.S. foreign policy. Even after his presidency, the changes to trade relationships, global supply chains, and market dynamics continue to shape the global economic landscape.
In conclusion, Trump's victory led to both immediate gains and long-term challenges for global markets, and its effects are likely to be felt for years to come.