@sunyuchentron @HuobiGlobal @HTX_Molly @SwieerX Everyone hates Sun, but everyone envies Sun more than they hate him. The candlestick chart of TRON is top-notch, so what's wrong with having a few more bites of coconut chicken? $trx
Seeing today's heat at this, this also has a recommendation of 25 points, I personally find this kind of CX model quite unpleasant, this kind of front-end is more likely to flip over, it's best not to invest too much if you want to participate, after all it's the first one, it has a bit of domestic flavor. Below is the link for observation, if you're worried about missing out, just participate a little, now SOL is expensive, all kinds of strange characters are coming to hype the blockchain revolution. https://www.gitfish.dev/?referrer=ARGgFLYozGwJHqyKukXAtfpeGycVrYx2VL83DTcnv1Rt
Hoje IDO: $NAINCY Pontos de Compromisso: 100 Compromisso: #VIRTUAL 0.47 ps: Veja quanto isso pode me dar de retorno, espero que me dê mais pontos para participar. @virtuals_io @KaitoAI @cookiedotfun @nAIncylabs #IPO #Alpha
oh,meu deus 。Eu participei deste projeto ontem à noite, e lembro de ter investido apenas 1.1 #VIRTUALS. Agora me deu mais de 70 vezes o retorno. Mas eu esqueci @KaitoAI @cookiedotfun @virtuals_io
Hoje’s IDO: $MANEKI Pontos de Compromisso:290 Compromisso :#VIRTUAL 1.18 Alocação Estimada:10429 ps:看下这次能回来多少,还剩下九个多小时,我塞进了我仅存少的可怜的积分。(Vamos ver quanto consigo recuperar desta vez. Ainda faltam mais de nove horas, então coloquei meus poucos pontos restantes) @virtuals_io @KaitoAI @Maneki_DeFi
The track spins, the machines are dancing The so-called 'Alpha' has long devolved from an information advantage to a script advantage, and the real participants in the entire market may be less than thirty thousand. There are many on-chain spectators, but few who are willing to spend money. Most projects cannot sustain their popularity beyond a weekend, leaving only studios mechanically maintaining activity levels, all for the sake of the next airdrop snapshot. Liquidity is concentrated in a very small number of 'appointed' currencies. In other words, the entire ecosystem is inflating the prices of these few coins, while other projects are merely accompanying materials. On the surface, it appears to be a consensus, but in reality, it is a stacking of risks. Airdrop delay = chain reaction The current prosperity is essentially a game of 'time for liquidity.' There is an expectation that someone will issue coins and conduct airdrops, which leads people to complete tasks, lock up assets, and push rankings. Once the pace of coin issuance slows down or the rewards fall below expectations, the speed of exit will far exceed the speed of entry—at that time, the liquidity withdrawal effect will quickly transmit to all projects relying on airdrop drives. The biggest problem with this structure is that: it cannot self-generate. There are no real users, nor is there actual demand. There is only the fast-food incentive of 'complete once, claim once.' This type of gameplay is only suitable for short-cycle speculation and cannot support long-term market value logic. Platform thinking determines market direction When Alpha becomes the mainstream logic, the incentive mechanism design of the platform itself becomes a source of systemic risk. Currently, most platforms' judgment criteria still rely on easily mass-produced data points like on-chain interaction volume and task completion rates. If the 'reward for brushing' incentive model continues to be indulged, what remains in the end will not be high-quality users, but a graveyard of zombie wallets and a batch of tokens destined to crash. There are only two ways out First, begin to liquidate the illusion of 'volume-driven brushing' and shift the incentive structure towards genuine user behavior. For example, bind long-term asset locking, social influence, off-chain identity verification, contribution proof, and other composite indicators. Second, reallocate liquidity resources. No longer allow liquidity to be perpetually concentrated in a few hot projects, but instead encourage liquidity 'rotation' through mechanisms, allowing more projects to have a basic trading depth survival space. In summary: If the frequency of airdrops decreases or the pace delays in the coming month, this wave of Alpha projects will face a collective stall. The market seems lively, but in reality, it is already self-destructing.
⚠️Participantes que já participaram da staking do Jupiter, atenção: A pré-venda da Huma ( @humafinance ) ainda tem 3 dias restantes para a votação, não se esqueçam de votar: 📷 https://t.co/lg6M5psVED Tema da votação desta rodada: Proposta de lançamento da pré-venda da Huma no Jupiter, os pontos principais são: A) Stakers de JUP podem participar da pré-venda do token Huma Quota de distribuição: 1% do suprimento total Regras de distribuição: quanto mais JUP for apostado, mais será a distribuição Tempo de desbloqueio: 3 meses após o TGE B) Troca entre DAO e o tesouro da DAO Valor: 250 mil dólares em tokens Huma ⇄ 250 mil dólares em JUP Huma Avaliação: FDV de 75 milhões de dólares (avaliação relativamente baixa) Período de bloqueio: 1 ano C) Jupiter estabelece uma parceria de longo prazo com a comunidade Huma 📷 Amigos que já apostaram, certifiquem-se de votar, não percam esta oportunidade de dupla renda! @JupiterExchange $JUP