Pessoal, o que diabos fizemos com o verdadeiro Soham? 😢 | Eli5DeFi no Binance Square

Página Inicial

Artigos Populares

Favoritos e Gostos

Centro de Criador

--

Pessoal, o que diabos fizemos com o verdadeiro Soham? 😢

Originário de @eli5_defi no 𝕏

Inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não constitui aconselhamento financeiro. Pode incluir conteúdo patrocinado e conteúdo de terceiros. Ver detalhes.

NOT

0,001938

+9.30%

342

0

Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas

⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas

💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos

👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse

E-mail/Número de telefone

Criador Relevante

@eli5_defi

Explorar Mais do Criador

➥ If You Have InfoFi Burnout and You're a Small Account, Then Read This Whatever voices are out there, we should recognize that the InfoFi narrative has now become an integral part of crypto and is establishing itself as a solid category on its own. But with more than 30 leaderboards on @KaitoAI to chase, checking Quacks on @wallchain_xyz, more SNAPs campaigns coming to @cookiedotfun, endless review tasks on @ethos_network, and other InfoFi protocol derivatives popping up everywhere, you might be facing burnout. Despite all your hard work, you haven't gained any meaningful engagement, earned Yaps, or received even a hint of an airdrop. It feels unfair. But you might have your strategy wrong here. How about we fix that first? Here are some tips for you: ➠ Take a 1-2 day break from crypto. Do workouts and other activities to refresh your mind. A healthy mindset is crucial for fixing issues and making progress. ➠ Big accounts climb leaderboards faster due to their influence. Focus on increasing your engagement, follower quality, and content standards to compete effectively. ➠ Choose 2-3 projects you know well and enjoy. Don't chase every leaderboard unless you have a team or proper systems to effectively manage the tasks. ➠ Reply genuinely to high-quality accounts you follow. Use AI for writing help, but make sure the ideas are your own. ➠ Create timely, quality content. When projects launch major updates, post within 24-48 hours to capture momentum and boost views. ➠ Don't beg for follows. This can get you blocked or suspended. Earn followers by showing genuine interest in discussions. ➠ Post and engage more on weekends when there's less competition for attention. FYI, I usually get more engagement on the weekends. ➠ Not part of their Discord or Telegram? Your post might go unnoticed. Join their community for better visibility and other potential collaboration. ➠ Post content people want to read. High-quality posts don't need length or graphics; they invite people to read and spark discussion.

--

➥ Level - The Onchain Banking Protocol @levelusd is emerging as one of the top stablecoin protocols, addressing the complexities of lending by combining two main banking models: → Full-reserve banking: Deposits remain untouched, ensuring 1:1 backing with treasuries or cash. → Fractional reserve banking: Increases capital efficiency by using deposits for lending, thus promoting credit creation and economic growth. Level serves as an additional layer for lending protocols, enabling users to mint $lvlUSD using stablecoins. It aggregates this collateral and allocates it to low-risk lending strategies, which in turn yield returns for the protocol. This process effectively adds liquidity to the crypto ecosystem without removing base assets from circulation. To date, Level has achieved impressive metrics: ➠ Weekly APY >7.0% ➠ Total reserves exceed $125M ➠ $102.55k in yield distributed ➠ Fully auditable and diversified low-risk strategy ➠ XP farm supporting various DeFi protocols, including @pendle_fi, @MorphoLabs, @Penpiexyz_io, @Equilibriafi, @CurveFinance, @beefyfinance, @spectra_finance, and @Contango_xyz ➠ Reduced unstake time from 5 to 3 days ➠ Redeem accrued yield in 3 days instead of 7 There is significant growth potential for Level, especially if they keep enhancing their composability and forge additional integrations.

--

➥ Who Will Control The AI Singularity? Friend of mine and @ionet Co-Founder, @MTorygreen, just shared some thought-provoking pieces that really got my gears turning. What if we're at the brink of humanity's next big divide? One path steers us toward a dystopian future dominated by a few AI-driven mega-corporations, while the other paves the way for a future rooted in decentralized infrastructure. A decentralized mesh that encompasses AI and physical infrastructure offers a solution by extending the principle of "not your keys, not your crypto" to cognition itself. For me it's the viable path and the most efficient path to achieve AI singularity without disregard ethical aspects. This approach transforms several critical situations: - GPU supply bottlenecks → Resource efficiency for physical infra via DePIN such as IONet - Cognitive filtering → Censorship resistance - Privacy Concerns → Preservation of privacy and attribution - Systemic fragility → Resilient, transparent, and inclusive AI infrastructure To establish this infrastructure, the window is rapidly closing. We have perhaps 18-24 months before compliance walls solidify and centralized players cement their dominance, as they have the necessary resources to navigate the complexity of regulatory mazes. This should be a wake-up call and urge every builders to closing in the gaps, with a strong closing: "Decentralized AI isn't just a hedge against centralization. It's the fire escape for a building that's already starting to burn. We either build that escape route now—while the window is still open—or we'll be watching the flames spread from inside a locked room." Now, It's up to us to choose and build the future.

--

➥ Camp Testnet Act 2 @campnetworkxyz has launched the second phase of their testnet, featuring 16 participating protocols. Let’s explore them one by one ⤵️ --- — AI x IP ➠ @reblapp: A generative AI and content creator community platform ➠ @xross__road: Merging Japan's IP, such as anime and manga, with Web3 ownership --- — Consumer Apps ➠ @rarible: A popular NFT platform and marketplace ➠ @ConftApp: Building multi-chain product suites, including a launchpad, NFT aggregator, and DIDs ➠ @onbd_art: A curator and incubator focused on discovering, conceptualizing, and realizing NFT projects, artists, and creators ➠ @CheB_Inc: A Web3 hyper-local sneaker and fashion company ➠ @arkivist_ai: A WebAR-ready 3D content generator for content creators, powered by AI tools --- — Games ➠ @WeepingPlebs: An on-chain meme-based FPS ➠ @OlympicsDotFun: A competitive, team-based virtual sports competition ➠ @rapier_xyz: An on-chain creature collection game, similar to Pokémon ➠ @OrbiMatrix: Web3 SaaS solutions for gaming --- — Social ➠ @blocsocial_: A Web3 event creator for communities ➠ @MySphereAI: On-chain social dApps ➠ @Dmailofficial: AI-powered, decentralized, and private messaging infrastructure --- — DeFi ➠ @xade_xyz: An AI agents launchpad --- — Media ➠ @hitmakrr: A decentralized audio protocol --- For more information and updates on projects developing on Camp, follow @campnetworkeco.

--

➥ To Badge or Not to Badge? Over the past few weeks, I've noticed many web3 content creator peers wearing affiliate badges in their profiles. I think this approach offers great visibility benefits for both projects and content creators, but it also comes with significant risks: ➠ Once you accept an affiliate badge, you can't revoke it yourself unless the project removes it for you. ➠ This becomes a negative situation if the projects you supported turn out to be unreliable, engage in slow-rug schemes, or get involved in suspicious activities. If they refuse to remove your badge, you become unofficially complicit in their actions. ➠ In one extreme case, a project demanded payment of up to five figures as compensation to remove the badge. ➠ There have been account suspensions on X that also affected their affiliates through a widening suspension effect. You don't want to wake up to an email from X about your account status. --- Personally, I've received several offers to wear badges, but aside from the risks mentioned above, I want to remain impartial so I can support projects in an objective way. Here are some alternatives you can consider: ➠ Instead of wearing the badge, you can put it in your bio section. ➠ Include clauses in your agreement or contract that require the project to remove the badge if you request it. If they can't grant this request, that's definitely a red flag, and I suggest not supporting them further. ➠ Only put badges for projects that you truly understand inside and out. You can request video calls with the team, etc. This won't eliminate the risks entirely, but DYOR has saved me many times.

--

Últimas Notícias

Binance CEO Richard Teng Reflects on 8 Years of Growth, Talks AI, Security, and What’s Next

--

Trump to Sign Tax Reform Bill Amid Economic Discussions

--

Stablecoin Legislation Could Propel Crypto Industry to Trillions, Says Advisor

--

U.S. Unemployment Claims Rise Despite Job Market Focus

--

Nano Labs Acquires Significant BNB Holdings in OTC Transaction

--

Preferências de cookies

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Preferências de cookies