seeing lots of discussion around mdrops. should I write a t | 0xrooter no Binance Square

Página Inicial

Artigos Populares

Favoritos e Gostos

Centro de Criador

--

seeing lots of discussion around mdrops.
should I write a thread about our experience and learnings using mdrops?

Aviso Legal: inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não se trata de aconselhamento financeiro. Poderá incluir conteúdos patrocinados. Consulta os Termos e Condições.

0

0

Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas

⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas

💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos

👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse

E-mail/Número de telefone

Criador Relevante

@0xrooter

Explorar Mais do Criador

some quick thoughts on mdrops people wrongly blame SEND price action on mdrops. it's understandable, since it was first-of-its kind and highly visible. in reality, SEND's price action is due to *extremely* generous tokenomics. 25% of SEND was airdropped to early users. that's WAY more than most projects do. it was huge, one of the biggest in sui history. we broke away from the low float high FDV meta that people hate. but the reality is that holders just want number go up, they don't care how. in practice, low float high FDV makes it much easier for good performance due to supply control. it's the same reason many pumpfun tokens did well -- devs snipe up to 90% of the supply, severly limiting the sell pressure. but suilend is a legitimate, transparent project. we chose to give the tokens to the community, not keep them for ourselves and VCs. the mdrop helped mitigate a lot of selling pressure, and bootstrapped the suilend treasury with 5M SUI. so far, $2.2M has been used for buybacks which are ongoing. (another big criticism btw -- people wrongly believe mdrop proceeds went to the team but in reality they're being used for buybacks. slowly, over time.) here's my guess to what would've happened if suilend didn't use mdrops - SEND price wouldn't have gone as high as it did - current price would be the same - suilend treasury would not have $2M in dry powder for buybacks also, people often point to hyperliquid as a shining example of how to launch a token, but fail to recognize that hyperliquid is a generational outlier. not every project can be hyperliquid -- bootstrapped because founders already made it, wildly successful product in both narrative and revenue. any number of projects can recreate HYPE's tokenomics and not see the same level of success. the name way countless projects copied curve's ve tokenomics and still failed. because tokenomics don't make a project, the product does.

--

flex your @ATTNtoken waitlist invite stats I'll start

--

ATTN is the most interesting experiment happening on sui right now. if you're not paying attention, ngmi.

--

suilend's SUI-denominated TVL continues to grow and is at an all-time high!

--

if you're trading onchain, why aren't you using http://send.ag? - zero fees - aggregates from 5 aggregators so you get the best price - can trade within suilend account

--

Últimas Notícias

Federal Reserve's Goolsbee Advocates for Continued Rate Cuts

--

Trump Holds Meeting with Defense Officials in Situation Room

--

Bitcoin(BTC) Drops Below 100,000 USDT with a Narrowed 1.06% Increase in 24 Hours

--

Ethereum(ETH) Drops Below 2,200 USDT with a Narrowed 0.45% Increase in 24 Hours

--

XRP News: XRP Reclaims $2 as Futures Volume Surges to $4B Amid ETF Momentum

--

Preferências de cookies

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Preferências de cookies