estou recebendo esse erro na minha carteira; é estranho porq | binji_x no Binance Square

Página Inicial

Artigos Populares

Favoritos e Gostos

Centro de Criador

--

estou recebendo esse erro na minha carteira; é estranho porque tenho todos os fundos necessários para isso... 
alguém sabe o que está acontecendo? 
estou no @base 
mesmo problema no @Rabby_io & @rainbowdotme

Aviso Legal: inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não se trata de aconselhamento financeiro. Poderá incluir conteúdos patrocinados. Consulta os Termos e Condições.

71

0

Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas

⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas

💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos

👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse

E-mail/Número de telefone

Criador Relevante

@binji_x

Explorar Mais do Criador

we should solve this problem if we want mainstream adoption: wallets and apps treat nonce state as a private thing despite it being global shared data that lives in the mempool. without a synchronization layer different frontends will diverge and users will face invisible deadlocks like what i had today. the fix may be: > expose pending nonce information through a common api and surface any "stuck" statuses in wallet client uis + prompt replacement logic so users do not have to solve this stuff themselves users should *never* touch nonce gymnastics or need to be exposed to mempool heuristics. until that coordination exists at the apps/wallets level, we will need @basedkarbon & @AgentChud to save us each time. as for what happened, if you're curious: > every evm account maintains a monotonic sequence number called the nonce. >the chain will only accept a transaction whose nonce = the account’s current onchain value. >once a transaction is pending, the same nonce is locked until that transaction lands or is explicitly replaced. >i underpriced one transaction on base so it sat in limbo. >my local nonce cache in rainbow said next nonce is "x" yet the network still expected "n" rainbow coinbase wallet and rabby all signed new payloads with nonce x but without the required gas bump to satisfy the replacement rule every node discarded them and no txs went through. as a user *every* wallet gave zero user feedback that this was the root of the issue. to actually implement the solution, @MetaMask rescued me because its advanced panel exposes both nonce and dynamic fee fields. i resubmitted a 0 eth transfer to myself with the identical nonce as my last tx and a much higher priority fee + gas limit and the backlog cleared within seconds.

--

we should solve this problem if we want mainstream adoption: wallets and apps treat nonce state as private thing despite it being global shared data that lives in the mempool. without a synchronization layer different frontends will diverge and users will face invisible deadlocks like what i had today. the fix may be: > expose pending nonce information through a common api and surface any "stuck" statuses in wallet client uis + prompt replacement logic so users do not have to solve this stuff themselves users should *never* touch nonce gymnastics or need to be exposed to mempool heuristics. until that coordination exists at the apps/wallets level, we will need @basedkarbon & @AgentChud to save us each time. as for what happened, if you're curious: > every evm account maintains a monotonic sequence number called the nonce. >the chain will only accept a transaction whose nonce = the account’s current onchain value. >once a transaction is pending, the same nonce is locked until that transaction lands or is explicitly replaced. >i underpriced one transaction on base so it sat in limbo. >my local nonce cache in rainbow said next nonce is "x" yet the network still expected "n" rainbow coinbase wallet and rabby all signed new payloads with nonce x but without the required gas bump to satisfy the replacement rule every node discarded them and no txs went through. as a user *every* wallet gave zero user feedback that this was the root of the issue. to actually implement the solution, @MetaMask rescued me because its advanced panel exposes both nonce and dynamic fee fields. i resubmitted a 0 eth transfer to myself with the identical nonce as my last tx and a much higher priority fee + gas limit and the backlog cleared within seconds.

--

remember when we had to change nonces lol

--

ethereum say it back

--

who is the biggest extractor in crypto history?

--

Últimas Notícias

Vitalik Buterin Discusses AI's Impact on Learning and Development

--

Airwallex CEO Questions the Practical Use of Stablecoins

--

Bitcoin Core Strategy Sparks Controversy in Community

--

U.S. Department of Justice Seeks Forfeiture of $7.74 Million in Cryptocurrency Linked to North Korean IT Workers

--

U.S. Bitcoin Spot ETFs Experience Significant Net Outflows

--

Preferências de cookies

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Preferências de cookies