Kaito Yaps 101: Understand and act correctly to earn Yaps mo | TatThang no Binance Square

Página Inicial

Artigos Populares

Favoritos e Gostos

Centro de Criador

--

Kaito Yaps 101: Understand and act correctly to earn Yaps most effectively
This article is dedicated to Vietnamese brothers who want to learn and achieve better results in the Yaps race with brothers around the world
Let's get to it 👇

Aviso Legal: inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não se trata de aconselhamento financeiro. Poderá incluir conteúdos patrocinados. Consulta os Termos e Condições.

302

0

Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas

⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas

💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos

👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse

E-mail/Número de telefone

Criador Relevante

@tatthang

Explorar Mais do Criador

Abstract isn’t just the cheapest L2. It’s 10x–30x cheaper than Arbitrum, ZkSync, and Optimism. But that’s just the surface. Those savings are reinvested into the ecosystem: > Free streaming > Zero-gas UX via AGW > Real fee-sharing via Panoramic Governance > 70K+ daily users, 16M+ tx/mo Low fees with purpose. It’s consumer crypto done right.

--

Do we need Altseason to succeed in crypto? This is a question I’ve been thinking about a lot lately. I joined the space around 2020, and since then I’ve seen a bit of everything: crazy pumps, brutal crashes, overhyped projects, silent builders, and everything in between. And honestly, after all these years, my answer is: no, you don’t need altseason to make it. I know that sounds weird, especially when everyone seems to be waiting for the next big run. But let’s be real: what is it that people are really waiting for? That feeling from 2020–2021? Where you just followed some KOL’s tweet, bought a coin, and woke up to your portfolio 5x overnight? Or that belief that the next altseason will fix everything. The bags, the regrets, the missed chances? I get it. It’s tempting. But I’ve been here long enough to see the pattern. Most of those altseasons come and go and people either miss them, or get greedy, or leave after getting burned. Meanwhile, I’ve watched others do it differently. People like @waleswoosh, @beast_ico, @MINHxDYNASTY. They weren’t chasing pumps. They were building, learning, creating in the bear and in the chop. They didn’t wait for the market to get hot to start showing up. And then there are people like Keungz, Frank, and others I used to see all the time. They were on fire during the bull but now they’ve stepped away. It made me realize something: altseason isn’t what makes you successful. It just amplifies whatever you’ve already been doing. If you’re learning, building, creating value. A bull run will boost you. If you’re lost, chasing noise. It’ll only speed up the burn. So yeah, altseason is nice. But it’s not the answer. Sticking around, doing the work, staying curious, that’s what really matters. Cycles come and go. But if you’re here for the right reasons, you’ll find your wins with or without an altseason. Bet on yourself.

--

New Ethos feature just dropped: Listings. Ethos users now get limited “bullish” or “bearish” votes each month to signal which projects they believe in. But here’s what’s interesting 👇

--

Unpopular Opinion: Loud’s attention flywheel might be broken or at least in need of a serious tune-up. I’m not sure what the team plans after the first payout, but here’s what I’ve been thinking: The Loud model was bold, but short-lived. The idea was simple: incentivize top KOLs to generate attention → that attention drives volume → the top 25 KOLs split trading fees. In theory, it’s genius. In practice, it burned hot but faded fast. Since TGE, volume has dropped every single day. - Day 1: $10M+ - Day 6: ~$213K - Market cap: down ~90% from ATH 1. The game wasn’t ready. After just 6 days, there’s very little content left to post. Over 50% of the top 25 climbed the board with engagement bait or shallow threads not necessarily because they lack quality, but because there’s simply not enough substance to talk about yet. Loud didn’t prepare enough narrative fuel to sustain interest. Even the best creators need something to work with. 2. Small creators were sidelined. Let’s be honest: what exactly is the incentive for a small creator to participate? - No realistic shot at leaderboard rewards - No clear holding or loyalty benefits - No structure for discovery or amplification Cheering from the sidelines in hopes that a top KOL might tip you? That’s not a system. That’s a wish. 3. The leaderboard became toxic, fast. By day 5, it wasn’t about who created value. It was about who was louder, who had better “smart follower” ratios, or who gamed the algo better. Instead of building a culture of collaboration, it became a leaderboard of drama. That doesn’t help the project or anyone in it in the long run. The responsibilities and benefits of stakeholders in Loud are built around the top 25 and I think that's still correct. But perhaps we need to reassess these realities to adjust and adapt more appropriately. Because if not, everything Loud has will be like a shooting star passing through CT and no matter how beautiful it once was, people will soon forget.

--

Gm. Happy Friday everyone

--

Últimas Notícias

Huma Finance After Binance Launchpool: How This PayFi Pioneer Is Reimagining Real-World Assets in DeFi

--

Japanese Firm Remixpoint Acquires Additional Bitcoin Worth $4.7 Million

--

Musk and Trump Clash Impacts Tesla Stock

--

Uber CEO Discusses Bitcoin and Stablecoins

--

Bitdeer Reports Increase in Bitcoin Holdings

--

Preferências de cookies

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Preferências de cookies