zkp

🔥 ALERTA ZAKUPU — $ZKP • Wejście / Zakup: 0.1296• Cele (TP): TP1: 0.1350 TP2: 0.1450 TP3: 0.1600+ 🚀• DCA: 0.1260 – 0.1230• Stop Loss (SL): 0.1190• Ryzyko: Niskie–Średnie 🟢
#zkp #bullish

$ZKP is quietly forming a base following its recent pullback, signaling that sellers are losing grip. The token has successfully defended its key demand zone, consistently absorbing dips and rejecting lower prices. This corrective pullback appears healthy, with fading sell pressure and stabilizing momentum.

Trading Setup:
Entry: 0.126 – 0.130
Stop Loss: 0.122
Take Profit 1: 0.136
Take Profit 2: 0.145
The structure remains intact, suggesting that as long as the current base holds, the higher-probability move is continuation to the upside. Traders can consider entering a long position around the current range with defined risk management in place.
Current Market Snapshot:
Pair: ZKPUSDT (Perpetual)
Price: 0.12828
Change: +1.41%
Overall, $ZKP is showing signs of strength and accumulation, making it a compelling setup for traders looking for a potential upward move.
#zkp

Kiedy większość ludzi myśli o prywatności blockchaina, wyobrażają sobie anonimowe transfery lub ukryte salda. W regulowanej finansach jednak prywatność rzadko jest opcjonalna—jest to warunek wstępny do prowadzenia działalności. Zdałem sobie z tego sprawę, obserwując instytucjonalne przepływy pracy. Brokerzy, powiernicy, audytorzy i zespoły ds. zgodności codziennie zajmują się wrażliwymi danymi. Każda transakcja, każdy tokenizowany zasób, każdy proces onboardingu klienta wiąże się z surowymi wymaganiami dotyczącymi poufności. Jednocześnie organy regulacyjne potrzebują zapewnienia, że zasady są przestrzegane. Tradycyjne blockchainy mają trudności z jednoczesnym spełnieniem obu potrzeb. Dusk podejmuje to wyzwanie bezpośrednio.

It’s easy to hear “privacy blockchain” and imagine secrecy for secrecy’s sake: anonymous payments, hidden balances, or stealth transactions. But in regulated finance, privacy is rarely optional—it’s a business requirement. I realized this while observing how institutional workflows operate. Brokers, custodians, auditors, and compliance teams interact constantly. Every trade, every tokenized asset, every client onboarding process comes with sensitive data that cannot be broadcast to the world. At the same time, regulators demand proof that transactions are legitimate. Traditional blockchains don’t handle this well. They expose too much, too quickly, or require cumbersome off-chain workarounds. Dusk is attempting to solve exactly this gap.
Dusk positions itself not as a general-purpose chain with privacy tacked on, but as a privacy-first infrastructure designed from the ground up for regulated finance. This distinction matters because financial institutions need two things that often conflict: confidentiality and verifiability. A bank cannot show everyone its client positions, portfolio sizes, or settlement instructions—but regulators and auditors still need proof that rules were followed. Dusk’s approach is to embed selective disclosure and zero-knowledge proofs into the core of the protocol, so privacy and compliance coexist rather than compete.
Zero-knowledge proofs, or ZKPs, are central to this model. At a high level, a ZKP allows a party to prove that a statement is true without revealing the underlying data. In Dusk, this means transactions, eligibility checks, and compliance verification can all happen without exposing sensitive details. PLONK serves as the backbone of the ZKP system, chosen for efficient verification, reusable circuits, and small proof sizes. The practical outcome is a network where institutions can demonstrate compliance and correctness while maintaining confidentiality—essentially building a blockchain version of private, auditable vaults.
Consider tokenized securities as an example. On traditional rails, trading bonds or private equities involves multiple intermediaries, each with full visibility. The issuer doesn’t want their holdings public, the buyer wants discretion, and the regulator wants assurance that rules are enforced. Dusk allows the buyer to generate a ZK proof that satisfies eligibility, KYC, and AML requirements without revealing the full identity or positions to the network. If a regulator needs to audit, only the relevant data is revealed, maintaining confidentiality elsewhere. This is selective disclosure in action: not secrecy for its own sake, but privacy with accountability.
Dusk’s technical implementation also shows maturity. The team has released public Rust implementations of PLONK, including KZG10 polynomial commitments and custom gates, ensuring proofs are efficient and usable at scale. This is critical: if proofs are too large, slow, or expensive to verify, ZK remains theoretical. Dusk’s work demonstrates a path toward practical, high-performance privacy for regulated environments.
But privacy alone isn’t enough—real adoption depends on integration with regulated workflows. Dusk is actively engaging in Europe’s tokenized asset ecosystem, where regulation is strict but experimental. The EU’s DLT Pilot Regime is one such avenue, with regulated venues like 21X collaborating with Dusk as a trade participant. This isn’t just marketing; it’s validation that the technology can operate in environments where compliance is mandatory, not optional.
What differentiates Dusk from other ZK projects is its focus on practical financial requirements. Many zero-knowledge implementations in crypto focus on anonymity or scaling, which is fine for payments or DeFi experimentation. Regulated finance is different. Institutions require confidential transactions and verifiable legitimacy. Systems must enforce identity gating, compliance checks, audit trails, and dispute resolution—without leaking sensitive data. Dusk’s selective disclosure model is built explicitly for this environment, aiming to meet regulatory standards while keeping data private by default.
From an investor perspective, the implication is straightforward. Tokenized finance—the on-chain trading of bonds, equities, funds, or credit—cannot scale on public rails that expose counterparties or positions. Privacy becomes infrastructure, not optional. ZKPs are not a feature to advertise; they are a requirement for doing real business on-chain. Dusk’s bet is that its privacy-first design can integrate directly into regulated workflows, providing controlled disclosure, efficient proofs, and built-in auditability from day one.
Ultimately, Dusk isn’t trying to make privacy “cool” or mysterious. It’s building infrastructure where confidentiality is a prerequisite for operating in regulated markets. Traders and institutions will adopt it because it reduces operational risk and satisfies compliance requirements. Just as HTTPS became ubiquitous because businesses demanded secure protocols—not because it was exciting—ZK-enabled finance will succeed quietly, but indispensably.
Dusk’s long-term story is simple but powerful: privacy is no longer a luxury; it is foundational infrastructure for regulated finance. The real-world value isn’t hype—it’s operational capability, compliance readiness, and the ability to move tokenized assets securely, privately, and efficiently. If Dusk executes, it may define what private, auditable finance looks like on-chain.
@Dusk
$DUSK
#zkp #blockchain
$DUSK

Dowód zerowej wiedzy, czyli ZKP, jest "sekretnym składnikiem" nowoczesnej prywatności blockchaina. Wyobraź sobie, że możesz udowodnić, że masz wystarczająco dużo pieniędzy na transakcję, nie pokazując nigdy swojego całkowitego salda. 🤯
W świecie, w którym przejrzystość jest standardem, ZKP stają się ostatecznym mostem między prywatnością a bezpieczeństwem.
💡 Czym jest ZKP w prostych słowach?
Dowód zerowej wiedzy obejmuje dwóch graczy:
Prover: Chce udowodnić, że stwierdzenie jest prawdziwe.
Weryfikator: Musi potwierdzić, że to prawda, nie widząc "jak" ani "dlaczego."