microstrategy

Lately, there’s been more and more noise around $BTC and its future 🚀
But let’s look at the picture realistically 👀 — name at least one coin that has grown the same way #BTC has.
From its launch in 2009 to December 2025, #BTC price increased by more than 8.9 billion percent 📈🔥
Starting price (2009–2010):
In 2009, Bitcoin had virtually no market value, and in early 2010 its price was less than $0.001 per coin. The first recorded exchange price in 2010 was around $0.0025 🪙
All-time high (2025):
In October 2025, Bitcoin reached its absolute peak, surpassing $126,000 💎🚀
Over 14 years (since 2011):
Total growth exceeded 20,000,000% 🤯
In 2010, people were given 5 bitcoins just for solving a CAPTCHA 🤖 — around 20,000 bitcoins were distributed in total.
Remember the pizza story? 🍕
Back then, 10,000 BTC were worth $40… and now? 😳
Why didn’t they give away gold ⚜️ or oil 🛢️ for solving CAPTCHAs or something similar?
Bitcoin’s price is supported because it was the first cryptocurrency 🥇. There’s huge hype and attention around it. It used to be blocked from all sides ❌, and now it’s being adopted by institutions, banks, and more 🏦📊
But the price is artificial 🤖📊 — how many long-term holders are really left from 2009–2010? ⏳🪙🤔
Not financial advice ⚠️
Always do your own analysis 🧐📚
#MicroStrategy #BlackRock⁩ #JPMorgan #Bitcoin

While many investors see quantum computing as a serious threat, Michael Saylor argues it could become one of the most bullish events Bitcoin has ever experienced. Rather than signaling Bitcoin’s collapse, he believes quantum risk could act like a massive, one-time supply shock—stronger than any halving.
The MicroStrategy founder doesn’t dismiss the danger. Instead, he emphasizes that the threat isn’t unique to Bitcoin—it applies to the entire digital world. And that reality, he says, changes everything.
Quantum Risk as a Global “Y2K Moment”
Saylor likens quantum vulnerability to the Year 2000 (Y2K) issue. It wouldn’t be a niche crypto problem, but a crisis affecting all modern systems:
Everyone Is Impacted: Banks, governments, tech giants like Apple and Microsoft, and even defense institutions would be at risk.
Coordinated Global Action: Faced with existential danger, the world would be forced to adopt quantum-resistant cryptography. Debate would give way to urgency.
Mandatory Upgrades: Just as with Y2K, users would be required to update their software. As Saylor puts it, banks might say, “Update the app, or your account is frozen.”
Bitcoin, he argues, would follow a similar path. Holders would need to transfer their BTC from legacy addresses to new ones protected by quantum-safe cryptography.
The Bullish Core: A Massive Supply Shock
This is where Saylor believes the real upside lies. A forced network migration would dramatically reduce Bitcoin’s effective supply.
To move coins, owners must sign transactions using their existing private keys.
Many coins are lost forever—keys misplaced, owners deceased, hardware destroyed.
Those BTC would be unable to migrate to the new system.
Once the network disables the old, vulnerable addresses, all remaining coins in them would be permanently locked out of circulation. According to Saylor, this would amount to the largest BTC “burn” ever—far greater in impact than a halving. With demand intact and supply sharply reduced, the price dynamics could shift dramatically.
Question for Discussion
Saylor reframes a technological crisis as a historic opportunity. But does the logic hold?
Do you think Bitcoin’s eventual transition to quantum-resistant security could become its strongest bullish catalyst—or will uncertainty, fear, and technical risk dominate the narrative?
Share your thoughts.
#MichaelSaylor #MicroStrategy #Bitcoin #BTC

Investors fear quantum computers, but Michael Saylor sees them as an unprecedented bullish trigger for Bitcoin. How can a threat to the entire digital world become the most powerful halving-like event in history?
MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor flips the traditional "quantum threat" narrative on its head. Instead of an apocalyptic scenario for Bitcoin, he sees a unique catalyst for its price growth. His argument is built not on denying the risks, but on their global nature and the inevitable market response.
The Quantum Threat as a Global Y2K
Saylor compares the future quantum vulnerability to the "Year 2000 problem" (Y2K). It won't be an isolated Bitcoin issue, but a systemic crisis for the entire digital infrastructure:
Will Affect Everyone: Every bank, government, corporation (Apple, Microsoft), and defense contractor will face an existential threat.
A Unified Response: The world will be forced to massively transition to quantum-resistant encryption standards. Debates will take a backseat to the necessity of survival.
Forced Upgrade: Just like with Y2K, users worldwide will have to update their software. "Your bank will say: 'Install the new app, or we'll freeze your accounts,'" Saylor explains.
The Bitcoin network will undergo a similar process. All holders will be required to move their coins from old, vulnerable addresses to new, quantum-secured ones.
The Key Bullish Trigger: "The Great Burn"
This is where Saylor's logic becomes truly compelling for an investor. The mass migration to new addresses will lead to a colossal reduction in the real supply of BTC.
To protect their coins, an owner must sign a transaction with their old private key.
What will happen to "lost" coins? Keys are lost, owners have died, hard drives destroyed — these coins will not be able to migrate.
When the network finally deactivates the old vulnerable addresses (effectively "freezing" them), all coins in them will be permanently removed from circulation.
This will become the largest single burning event of bitcoins in history, vastly exceeding the effect of a halving. Demand for the upgraded, secure network will meet a radically reduced supply.
Question for Discussion
Saylor views the crisis as an opportunity, reframing the threat as a growth catalyst. But are we ready to trust this logic?
What do you think: Will the inevitable quantum transition for Bitcoin become the most powerful bullish event in its history, or will the associated risks and FUD outweigh it? Share your thoughts in the comments!
#MichaelSaylor #MicroStrategy #BTC $BTC  

Investors fear quantum computers, but Michael Saylor sees them as an unprecedented bullish trigger for Bitcoin. How can a threat to the entire digital world become the most powerful halving-like event in history?
MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor flips the traditional "quantum threat" narrative on its head. Instead of an apocalyptic scenario for Bitcoin, he sees a unique catalyst for its price growth. His argument is built not on denying the risks, but on their global nature and the inevitable market response.
The Quantum Threat as a Global Y2K
Saylor compares the future quantum vulnerability to the "Year 2000 problem" (Y2K). It won't be an isolated Bitcoin issue, but a systemic crisis for the entire digital infrastructure:
Will Affect Everyone: Every bank, government, corporation (Apple, Microsoft), and defense contractor will face an existential threat.A Unified Response: The world will be forced to massively transition to quantum-resistant encryption standards. Debates will take a backseat to the necessity of survival.Forced Upgrade: Just like with Y2K, users worldwide will have to update their software. "Your bank will say: 'Install the new app, or we'll freeze your accounts,'" Saylor explains.
The Bitcoin network will undergo a similar process. All holders will be required to move their coins from old, vulnerable addresses to new, quantum-secured ones.
The Key Bullish Trigger: "The Great Burn"
This is where Saylor's logic becomes truly compelling for an investor. The mass migration to new addresses will lead to a colossal reduction in the real supply of BTC.
To protect their coins, an owner must sign a transaction with their old private key.What will happen to "lost" coins? Keys are lost, owners have died, hard drives destroyed — these coins will not be able to migrate.When the network finally deactivates the old vulnerable addresses (effectively "freezing" them), all coins in them will be permanently removed from circulation.
This will become the largest single burning event of bitcoins in history, vastly exceeding the effect of a halving. Demand for the upgraded, secure network will meet a radically reduced supply.
Question for Discussion
Saylor views the crisis as an opportunity, reframing the threat as a growth catalyst. But are we ready to trust this logic?
What do you think: Will the inevitable quantum transition for Bitcoin become the most powerful bullish event in its history, or will the associated risks and FUD outweigh it? Share your thoughts in the comments!
#MichaelSaylor #MicroStrategy #BTC $BTC