Binance Square

peterktodd

0 Suivis
0 Abonnés
0 J’aime
0 Partagé(s)
Tout le contenu
--
Watching a talk at the Permissionless conference about defeating MEV on ethereum by running sequencers inside trusted execution environments. 🙄
Watching a talk at the Permissionless conference about defeating MEV on ethereum by running sequencers inside trusted execution environments. 🙄
They ran out of Tether hats at @BTCPrague I hear they didn't have the full supply they claimed they did.
They ran out of Tether hats at @BTCPrague

I hear they didn't have the full supply they claimed they did.
Interesting: it looks like a lot of private lightning channels are about to be closed in the next block.
Interesting: it looks like a lot of private lightning channels are about to be closed in the next block.
I modified my Bob @opentimestamps calendar to create sub-1sat/vB transactions. 0.12sat/vB! Mined by SpiderPool. I'm not sure how the transaction actually got to them; I lowered the relay fees on a few of my nodes to reach as many as possible. https://mempool.space/tx/13c666fdf0305e2d5d55a5d502f1e5b6a9597683507b256c1a4c1e80fca3a612?mode=details
I modified my Bob @opentimestamps calendar to create sub-1sat/vB transactions.

0.12sat/vB! Mined by SpiderPool. I'm not sure how the transaction actually got to them; I lowered the relay fees on a few of my nodes to reach as many as possible.

https://mempool.space/tx/13c666fdf0305e2d5d55a5d502f1e5b6a9597683507b256c1a4c1e80fca3a612?mode=details
“I wanted a mem pool. That's it. Nothing else.” @softsimon_ on his "booth" at @BTCPrague
“I wanted a mem pool. That's it. Nothing else.”

@softsimon_ on his "booth" at @BTCPrague
Worth reading: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406#issuecomment-2955614286 @glozow's highly detailed and footnoted explanation of why she merged the pull-req to uncap OP_Return outputs.
Worth reading: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406#issuecomment-2955614286

@glozow's highly detailed and footnoted explanation of why she merged the pull-req to uncap OP_Return outputs.
“...because of KYC. That's Kill Your Customer.” @lopp at Bitcoin 2025, talking about how bitcoiners' addresses leak, leading to home invasions. @TheBitcoinConf
“...because of KYC. That's Kill Your Customer.”

@lopp at Bitcoin 2025, talking about how bitcoiners' addresses leak, leading to home invasions.

@TheBitcoinConf
😂 I'm not sure that anyone on this panel is actually working on a system that is sufficiently secure to be considered an L2. https://petertodd.org/2024/covenant-dependent-layer-2-review#what-is-layer-2
😂

I'm not sure that anyone on this panel is actually working on a system that is sufficiently secure to be considered an L2.

https://petertodd.org/2024/covenant-dependent-layer-2-review#what-is-layer-2
Lolwut? Obviously mining is profitable enough that people keep doing it at bigger and bigger scales. The claim that "mining is very unprofitable to destroy seignorage" is bizarre: 1) difficulty adjusts 2) transaction fees If reward+fees is high, difficulty adjusts higher as more hashers are attracted and mining becomes less profitable. If reward+fees is lower, difficulty adjusts lower as hashers turn off their machines. Either way, long term _profitability_ of mining operations depends on your costs relative to others, and how much extra business you can attract (e.g. with non-std transactions). MARA obviously has done very well on the latter. In the long run taking away the block reward actually makes mining _more_ profitable for larger miners/pools: they can afford to play the most games with transaction selection and ordering. And they can do reorg attacks to steal fees from other miners. Smaller miners can't do this profitably as the overheads (and hash power) required to do this stuff is high. Your solo mining bitaxe is definitely not doing reorg attacks. We see this on Ethereum, where MEV has made the minimum investment to run a profitable pool has gotten to the tens of millions of dollars range. To be profitable, you basically need to be a high speed trading company. The "influencers" in this space are remarkably clueless.
Lolwut? Obviously mining is profitable enough that people keep doing it at bigger and bigger scales.

The claim that "mining is very unprofitable to destroy seignorage" is bizarre:

1) difficulty adjusts
2) transaction fees

If reward+fees is high, difficulty adjusts higher as more hashers are attracted and mining becomes less profitable. If reward+fees is lower, difficulty adjusts lower as hashers turn off their machines.

Either way, long term _profitability_ of mining operations depends on your costs relative to others, and how much extra business you can attract (e.g. with non-std transactions). MARA obviously has done very well on the latter.

In the long run taking away the block reward actually makes mining _more_ profitable for larger miners/pools: they can afford to play the most games with transaction selection and ordering. And they can do reorg attacks to steal fees from other miners. Smaller miners can't do this profitably as the overheads (and hash power) required to do this stuff is high. Your solo mining bitaxe is definitely not doing reorg attacks. We see this on Ethereum, where MEV has made the minimum investment to run a profitable pool has gotten to the tens of millions of dollars range. To be profitable, you basically need to be a high speed trading company.

The "influencers" in this space are remarkably clueless.
Connectez-vous pour découvrir d’autres contenus
Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos
⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos
💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s
👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse
Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone

Dernières actualités

--
Voir plus
Plan du site
Préférences en matière de cookies
CGU de la plateforme