The Bank for International Settlement ("BIS", regulatory body owned by global central banks) has a long section on stablecoins in their annual report published today.
The really interesting thing imo is the relationship they note between stablecoins and treasury bills as this explains a lot of the policy tailwinds the space will benefit from in the next few years - Stablecoins were amongst the top buyers of T-Bills in 2024 with $40bn... but as you know, the current rate of growth implies twice that in 2025 - A $3.5bn increase in stablecoin market capitalisation only compresses treasury yields by 2.5-5bps...
It is not a surprise that in an environment where deficits are ballooning, there is a clear vested interest in ensuring that supply grows.
Speaking of vested interest, the paper is generally negative on stablecoins but tbh, no surprises there.
your biggest risk is being liquidated in the industry you log into every single damn day to talk about since you know its gonna go up again eventually but you got too greedy with leverage
On Plasma's deposit cap raise yesterday, one interesting thing that I do not believe most people realised, is how different $500m -> $750m looked vs. $750m -> $1bn.
First $250m - Filled in only 10 blocks. - First transaction of block 1 slightly misconfigured its bot and paid a whopping $12k in fees (please avoid botting to burn your gas like this). - Median transaction size: $30k
Following $250m - Filled in 30 minutes. - Plenty of users only had to pay $1. - Median transaction size: $5k
Much easier for users to get in including those operating multisigs, hardware wallets, etc. As long as they were awake obviously.
It is also pretty obvious that the investor base was slightly different than on Monday (from the change in split of stables + wallets' funding sources).
Btw if market was efficient and believed that CRCL valuation makes a lot of sense (due to their business 10x in coming yrs), COIN should have repriced upwards massively.