Accueil
Notification
Profil
Articles populaires
Les actus
Favoris et mentions J’aime
Historique
Centre pour créateur
Paramètres
LoganJastremski
--
Suivre
Still crazy to me that in 2025 the Top L2s are doing le
s
s than 1MB/s of throughput
Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé.
Consultez les CG.
ETH
2 460,12
-0.87%
OP
0,551
-6.92%
143
0
Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos
⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos
💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s
👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse
Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone
Inscription
Connexion
Créateur pertinent
LoganJastremski
@LoganJastremski
Suivre
Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur
The Blockchain industry is going to be competing with High-Frequency trading if we are able aiming to achieve anything meaningful You'll need 10GB/s of throughput+ to remotely be competitive at scale
--
My observation from Hyperliquid is that they care less about playing crypto-native games As an example: - Transactions land FCFS - Validator set is co-located - Priority fees don't exist for trading - All flow is treated as toxic with prioritized cancels On the surface, these seem strange to the crypto community, but by focusing purely on their own merits, they're very sensible from a product point of view I'm increasingly bearish on crypto-native games of KOLs, "community marketing," and in favor of building shit we want to use
--
Reducing toxic flow is important, but eliminating priority fees for trading is a higher priority Toxic flow is a trackable issue, whereas priority fees require a system redesign
--
An honest conversation we’ve been thinking about is whether REV is the correct metric for valuing L1s. In the past, I would have unequivocally said yes, but now I’m not so sure Block auctions, and by extension priority fees and tips, increase randomness in access to valuable state, reducing market makers’ ability to quote tighter spreads If block auctions widen spreads by design and push us further from replacing NASDAQ, what is the point of optimizing for this metric if the result is a worse product? I dont have the answers here but food for thought
--
Sometimes we spend so much time in the crypto universe that we forget crypto is just technology that enables us to create better products It doesn’t matter if you have 1,000 KOLs and 100,000 Discord community members if your product sucks
--
Dernières actualités
Conflux Founders Hold Executive Roles in Hong Kong-listed Biotech Firm
--
Anemoi International Increases Investment in Bitcoin and Gold ETF
--
Robert Kiyosaki Expresses Confidence in Bitcoin's Future Potential
--
Conflux Shares Surge Following Acquisition News
--
Spanish Coffee Chain Vanadi Coffee Increases Bitcoin Holdings
--
Voir plus
Plan du site
Préférences en matière de cookies
CGU de la plateforme