All the smartest people I know in crypto listen to crypto po | mteamisloading sur Binance Square

Articles populaires

Favoris et mentions J’aime

Centre pour créateur

--

All the smartest people I know in crypto listen to crypto podcasts regularly

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.

2

0

Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos

⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos

💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s

👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse

Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone

Créateur pertinent

@mteamisloading

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

Only 2% of validators have consolidated stake since Pectra and EIP 7251. Validator count has actually increased since Pectra after an initial decline. This is important for L1 scaling, we need to up the social pressure on this.

--

6s slot times sound great. Very pro Ethereum prioritizing this for Glamsterdam. With that being said, scaling blob capacity should not be neglected until we have the best DA possible with the existing Ethereum nodes.

--

the based and native and immutable rollup propoganda will not stop until morale improves

--

A couple weeks ago a debate between @smyyguy and @_Jonahw aired on @theempirepod . Jonah made a point along the lines of: we need to forecast a forex rate when doing a DCF because yield for stakers is native yield (denominated in the staking token of the L1, not in USD). Dan returned that forecasts for amount of activity is often denominated in USD. He also makes the point that native token price doesn't proportionally affect that amount of activity in USD (i.e. 10% drop in ETH doesn't mean 10% drop in USD denominated amount of activity). Combined these indicate that the forex rate is kinda being double counted and thus doesn't need to be considered in the DCF. Jonah kinda dodged this point and emphasized that stakers are getting the native asset, not USD. I think this misses Dan's point by not getting at the idea that future cash flows are not (entirely) denominated in the native asset, so there is inherently some exchange rate already. I think it's interesting to think about my own user behaviors. I still think about gas fees in USD (i.e. subcent fees on Base is better than 30c on mainnet, not ETH). My demand to transact on Ethereum, though, isn't really denominated in ETH or USDC, it's denominated in the utility that it provides to me and the opportunity cost of the fees i need to pay. For example I spend much more freely from a crypto debit card I have vs a bank-issued card I have. It's the same USD cost, but it's annoying to withdraw to my bank. On the other hand, I have no idea how this translate to analyzing a population of users' aggregate demand to transact—could be much different from a macro perspective.

--

testnet infra wasn't working so we're testing on mainnet i love this company

--

Dernières actualités

Trump Advocates for Rate Cuts and Trade Tariff Notifications

--

U.S. President Trump Comments on Cryptocurrency Industry

--

Cel AI to Raise £7.5 Million for Bitcoin Treasury Strategy

--

Trump Discusses Flexibility in Tariff Agreement Deadline

--

Ethereum(ETH) Drops Below 2,400 USDT with a 1.20% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

Préférences en matière de cookies

CGU de la plateforme

CGU de la plateforme

Préférences en matière de cookies