MetaHunter168
0 Following
0 Followers
0 Liked
0 Shared
Posts
See original
Self-financed Work
A friend of mine left a large company last year and chose to join Hashkey. He said this would be the Coinbase of the East.
After joining, the company gave him a limit of several hundred thousand, allowing him to buy HSK at a price of 0.4 U, and his bonuses were also paid in HSK.
He believes that holding the platform token should allow him to passively become wealthy like early employees of BN and OKX.
Looking at the current price, I also dare not ask him how he's been lately.
A friend of mine left a large company last year and chose to join Hashkey. He said this would be the Coinbase of the East.
After joining, the company gave him a limit of several hundred thousand, allowing him to buy HSK at a price of 0.4 U, and his bonuses were also paid in HSK.
He believes that holding the platform token should allow him to passively become wealthy like early employees of BN and OKX.
Looking at the current price, I also dare not ask him how he's been lately.
See original
$BRAINL
Damn, you must be a dog dealer.
Just said it yesterday and today it's resurrected 10X? @hellosuoha
Who will resurrect next?
Damn, you must be a dog dealer.
Just said it yesterday and today it's resurrected 10X? @hellosuoha
Who will resurrect next?
See original
The Gaokao Also Has Its Tricks
Practicing questions or brushing up on passports, there’s a question of how to play the game here.
The Gaokao in recent days has been, for the vast majority, perhaps the most brutal competitive exam of their lives, like thousands of troops squeezing onto a narrow bridge.
Yet some people didn't even squeeze in. They chose to take a detour.
Some of the older folks I know opted to move their children's identities overseas early on, avoiding cram schools from a young age and returning to compete as 'international students' after high school graduation, entering domestic 985 and 211 universities with very low scores. With just a piece of identity, they easily 'overtake on a bend.'
This behavior is not cheating; it is a high-level play allowed within the system. It is the most typical and straightforward form of legal exploitation in the real world.
Many people used to think that 'exploitation' meant speculation, finding loopholes, or taking shortcuts, but it is not that at all.
True exploitation is a way of thinking; it is a result of a combination of cognition, vision, and execution.
From early years of P2P and postal currency arbitrage, to today's cryptocurrency airdrops, on the surface, these are opportunities in different fields; fundamentally, they reflect the same cognitive structure: understanding the rules, seeking structural dividends, executing quickly, and achieving excess returns.
Real exploiters are never limited to the play of a specific platform or a particular country. Their advantage lies not just in technology but in the differing levels of perspective in viewing the same problem.
For instance, can you break free from local thinking and see the language arbitrage, identity arbitrage, geographical arbitrage, and even information arbitrage between different countries from a global perspective? Even with the internet's development today, these arbitrage information gaps still exist in abundance.
The difference lies in which level you can view the problem from, which determines what level and odds of exploitation opportunities you can capture.
Just like the Gaokao every year, it is indeed a question, but there is no unique solution, and the paths are not just one. Whether practicing questions or taking a detour overseas, both are a form of cost/return betting.
In the ultimate sense, exploitation is a reflection of systemic cognitive ability, an understanding of rules, capturing trends, and the extreme realization of information gaps.
In my view, exploitation is not speculation; it is about winning according to the rules at a higher dimension.
Practicing questions or brushing up on passports, there’s a question of how to play the game here.
The Gaokao in recent days has been, for the vast majority, perhaps the most brutal competitive exam of their lives, like thousands of troops squeezing onto a narrow bridge.
Yet some people didn't even squeeze in. They chose to take a detour.
Some of the older folks I know opted to move their children's identities overseas early on, avoiding cram schools from a young age and returning to compete as 'international students' after high school graduation, entering domestic 985 and 211 universities with very low scores. With just a piece of identity, they easily 'overtake on a bend.'
This behavior is not cheating; it is a high-level play allowed within the system. It is the most typical and straightforward form of legal exploitation in the real world.
Many people used to think that 'exploitation' meant speculation, finding loopholes, or taking shortcuts, but it is not that at all.
True exploitation is a way of thinking; it is a result of a combination of cognition, vision, and execution.
From early years of P2P and postal currency arbitrage, to today's cryptocurrency airdrops, on the surface, these are opportunities in different fields; fundamentally, they reflect the same cognitive structure: understanding the rules, seeking structural dividends, executing quickly, and achieving excess returns.
Real exploiters are never limited to the play of a specific platform or a particular country. Their advantage lies not just in technology but in the differing levels of perspective in viewing the same problem.
For instance, can you break free from local thinking and see the language arbitrage, identity arbitrage, geographical arbitrage, and even information arbitrage between different countries from a global perspective? Even with the internet's development today, these arbitrage information gaps still exist in abundance.
The difference lies in which level you can view the problem from, which determines what level and odds of exploitation opportunities you can capture.
Just like the Gaokao every year, it is indeed a question, but there is no unique solution, and the paths are not just one. Whether practicing questions or taking a detour overseas, both are a form of cost/return betting.
In the ultimate sense, exploitation is a reflection of systemic cognitive ability, an understanding of rules, capturing trends, and the extreme realization of information gaps.
In my view, exploitation is not speculation; it is about winning according to the rules at a higher dimension.
See original
#okx Wallet is live @virtuals_io Ecosystem
Yesterday @hellosuoha calculated the staking and new listing data for virtual over the last 8 days,
Staking 9500 VIR for two years, currently earning 36000u of virgen + 560u of NAINCY + 2300U of MANEKI + 4000U of BIZ + 12000U of MNY + 4000U of ROBOT + airdrop of 1500U of ROBOT + 1500U of XOE + 280k points.
Approximately worth 50k + 8400u in points, earning and taking every day.
Yesterday @hellosuoha calculated the staking and new listing data for virtual over the last 8 days,
Staking 9500 VIR for two years, currently earning 36000u of virgen + 560u of NAINCY + 2300U of MANEKI + 4000U of BIZ + 12000U of MNY + 4000U of ROBOT + airdrop of 1500U of ROBOT + 1500U of XOE + 280k points.
Approximately worth 50k + 8400u in points, earning and taking every day.
See original
Is the script for harvesting hair backdoored and has it stolen 550 WU?
I didn't expect that even in 2052, a harvesting script could still steal such a large sum of money,
Everyone knows that harvesting involves large amounts or multiple accounts and should be done manually as much as possible,
Even when scripts are involved, the most important thing has never been the level of technical skill,
but trust, which has always been the most crucial part regarding technology.
If you really have to use external scripts, I also suggest everyone to feed the script to AI.
Today, I used AI to analyze the code repository of this stolen script to see if AI could find this backdoor?
It can be seen that AI detected malicious code; this malicious script is cleverly designed and will secretly update in the background.
Even if you carefully check it when you first install and use it, and it indicates there are no security risks, during subsequent use, if you are not careful, the code could be updated, and your private key could be quietly stolen in the background.
I recommend that if you use unfamiliar scripts, first use AI to check them; you can refer to the Prompts I provided.
"Thoroughly check each line of code in the repository to determine if this script will send private keys to third parties. Any behavior that transmits private keys, passwords, or other sensitive data to third parties [such as a specific TG account, remote server, etc.] is a dangerous behavior. For ordinary users who do not understand code, executing this script directly without making any changes, could there be security risks?"
I didn't expect that even in 2052, a harvesting script could still steal such a large sum of money,
Everyone knows that harvesting involves large amounts or multiple accounts and should be done manually as much as possible,
Even when scripts are involved, the most important thing has never been the level of technical skill,
but trust, which has always been the most crucial part regarding technology.
If you really have to use external scripts, I also suggest everyone to feed the script to AI.
Today, I used AI to analyze the code repository of this stolen script to see if AI could find this backdoor?
It can be seen that AI detected malicious code; this malicious script is cleverly designed and will secretly update in the background.
Even if you carefully check it when you first install and use it, and it indicates there are no security risks, during subsequent use, if you are not careful, the code could be updated, and your private key could be quietly stolen in the background.
I recommend that if you use unfamiliar scripts, first use AI to check them; you can refer to the Prompts I provided.
"Thoroughly check each line of code in the repository to determine if this script will send private keys to third parties. Any behavior that transmits private keys, passwords, or other sensitive data to third parties [such as a specific TG account, remote server, etc.] is a dangerous behavior. For ordinary users who do not understand code, executing this script directly without making any changes, could there be security risks?"
See original
What exactly is the MCP that even Open AI has bowed to? Did CZ hit the mark this time?
The wind of MCP has finally swept from Web2 to Web3. After becoming the protagonist in the AI industry, MCP quickly rose to fame, becoming one of the most talked-about technical standards in the past two months.
Why is it popular? Why is it important? And why did @cz_binance want to lay out MCP on BNB Chain at the first opportunity? Here are my thoughts.
1. What exactly is MCP? What is its relationship with large models and AI Agents?
In a nutshell, MCP is an open standard protocol that unifies the way AI models connect with the external world (data, tools, on-chain systems), serving as a universal interface that allows AI to truly "get things done."
I will use a set of simple metaphors to describe the relationships among the three:
1. Large models (like GPT, Claude): They are the smart brain, capable of understanding language and reasoning, but unable to directly manipulate the world.
2. AI Agent: They are the "virtual robots" that execute tasks, responsible for turning the brain's ideas into a series of actions.
3. MCP: It is the nervous system + universal adapter, connecting AI to various interfaces and data sources in the real world (on-chain data, APIs, contracts, databases, etc.).
The large model is responsible for "thinking," the AI Agent is responsible for "doing," and MCP is responsible for "connecting." Understanding the relationships among these three makes it easy to see why MCP is important.
MCP was proposed by Claude's parent company two years ago, and it gradually entered the mainstream view only in February of this year, exploding in March. The direct reason is that OpenAI also announced support for the MCP protocol, almost declaring it as the "industry standard."
This sudden popularity is not accidental; it reflects the increasingly evident ecological demand in the AI industry after experiencing the choice between "closed source vs. open source." After Claude announced the open sourcing of MCP and DeepSeek's strong rise, OpenAI had no choice but to set aside the pride of its "custom protocol" and turn to compatibility with MCP. The trend has come, and even a powerful entity like Open AI cannot reverse it.
The emergence of MCP marks the leap of AI applications from "being able to talk" to "being able to work." In the long run, it represents almost a paradigm shift in the operational model of the entire AI ecosystem.
2. CZ's layout of MCP: Is it just chasing a trend? It may be much more than that.
Why did CZ promote the landing of MCP on BNB Chain at the first opportunity? On the surface, it seems to be "embracing the AI craze," but in reality, it is a long-term layout for building a native public chain for AI Agents. There might be several layers of thinking behind this:
1. From the competition for traffic entry to the race for the Agent ecosystem
In the Web3 world, whoever controls the user's "first touchpoint" holds the power of traffic distribution, pricing discourse, and business closure.
The entry point in Web2 is the App Store, while the entry point in Web3 might be the operating environment of Agents.
MCP is the key infrastructure for this environment. Through standardized calls, BNB Chain can facilitate countless interactions between AI Agents and on-chain tools, becoming the "habitat" for AI Agents.
This is exactly CZ's consistent logic: not just to be an exchange, but to be a platform for traffic and assets.
2. Locking in the developer ecosystem, lowering the threshold, and creating a "high ground for Agent construction"
In the future, AI Agents are likely to become the mainstream application form in Web3, and what developers care about most is: how to quickly, safely, and with low barriers build Agents.
MCP addresses these issues. The official suite of development tools provided by BNB Chain to support developers means that a large number of AI native DApps will grow on BNB Chain in the future.
If Solana seized the Meme high point through casino logic, then CZ is capturing the mindset of more AI developers in the future. You send Memes, I send Agents. It’s a competition of who has a higher strategic vision and sharper insight.
3. Seizing the key opportunity for deep integration of AI and blockchain
The combination of AI and blockchain is not new; many past and current projects have lingered more on narratives and hype. Technically speaking, MCP provides a truly feasible way to combine: through protocol standards, it can connect AI's intelligent invocation capabilities with on-chain execution capabilities, forming a closed loop.
From these points, one cannot help but admire CZ's strategic intuition, just as when Binance was not just a matching engine but a complete system involving fiat currency entry, Launchpad, BSC, etc.
This time is no different; if CZ wants to get involved, then he will set standards, create underlying tools, and become the most comprehensive connector.
CZ is also chasing trends, but more fundamentally, he prefers to define trends. This is the greatest significance of this matter.
The wind of MCP has finally swept from Web2 to Web3. After becoming the protagonist in the AI industry, MCP quickly rose to fame, becoming one of the most talked-about technical standards in the past two months.
Why is it popular? Why is it important? And why did @cz_binance want to lay out MCP on BNB Chain at the first opportunity? Here are my thoughts.
1. What exactly is MCP? What is its relationship with large models and AI Agents?
In a nutshell, MCP is an open standard protocol that unifies the way AI models connect with the external world (data, tools, on-chain systems), serving as a universal interface that allows AI to truly "get things done."
I will use a set of simple metaphors to describe the relationships among the three:
1. Large models (like GPT, Claude): They are the smart brain, capable of understanding language and reasoning, but unable to directly manipulate the world.
2. AI Agent: They are the "virtual robots" that execute tasks, responsible for turning the brain's ideas into a series of actions.
3. MCP: It is the nervous system + universal adapter, connecting AI to various interfaces and data sources in the real world (on-chain data, APIs, contracts, databases, etc.).
The large model is responsible for "thinking," the AI Agent is responsible for "doing," and MCP is responsible for "connecting." Understanding the relationships among these three makes it easy to see why MCP is important.
MCP was proposed by Claude's parent company two years ago, and it gradually entered the mainstream view only in February of this year, exploding in March. The direct reason is that OpenAI also announced support for the MCP protocol, almost declaring it as the "industry standard."
This sudden popularity is not accidental; it reflects the increasingly evident ecological demand in the AI industry after experiencing the choice between "closed source vs. open source." After Claude announced the open sourcing of MCP and DeepSeek's strong rise, OpenAI had no choice but to set aside the pride of its "custom protocol" and turn to compatibility with MCP. The trend has come, and even a powerful entity like Open AI cannot reverse it.
The emergence of MCP marks the leap of AI applications from "being able to talk" to "being able to work." In the long run, it represents almost a paradigm shift in the operational model of the entire AI ecosystem.
2. CZ's layout of MCP: Is it just chasing a trend? It may be much more than that.
Why did CZ promote the landing of MCP on BNB Chain at the first opportunity? On the surface, it seems to be "embracing the AI craze," but in reality, it is a long-term layout for building a native public chain for AI Agents. There might be several layers of thinking behind this:
1. From the competition for traffic entry to the race for the Agent ecosystem
In the Web3 world, whoever controls the user's "first touchpoint" holds the power of traffic distribution, pricing discourse, and business closure.
The entry point in Web2 is the App Store, while the entry point in Web3 might be the operating environment of Agents.
MCP is the key infrastructure for this environment. Through standardized calls, BNB Chain can facilitate countless interactions between AI Agents and on-chain tools, becoming the "habitat" for AI Agents.
This is exactly CZ's consistent logic: not just to be an exchange, but to be a platform for traffic and assets.
2. Locking in the developer ecosystem, lowering the threshold, and creating a "high ground for Agent construction"
In the future, AI Agents are likely to become the mainstream application form in Web3, and what developers care about most is: how to quickly, safely, and with low barriers build Agents.
MCP addresses these issues. The official suite of development tools provided by BNB Chain to support developers means that a large number of AI native DApps will grow on BNB Chain in the future.
If Solana seized the Meme high point through casino logic, then CZ is capturing the mindset of more AI developers in the future. You send Memes, I send Agents. It’s a competition of who has a higher strategic vision and sharper insight.
3. Seizing the key opportunity for deep integration of AI and blockchain
The combination of AI and blockchain is not new; many past and current projects have lingered more on narratives and hype. Technically speaking, MCP provides a truly feasible way to combine: through protocol standards, it can connect AI's intelligent invocation capabilities with on-chain execution capabilities, forming a closed loop.
From these points, one cannot help but admire CZ's strategic intuition, just as when Binance was not just a matching engine but a complete system involving fiat currency entry, Launchpad, BSC, etc.
This time is no different; if CZ wants to get involved, then he will set standards, create underlying tools, and become the most comprehensive connector.
CZ is also chasing trends, but more fundamentally, he prefers to define trends. This is the greatest significance of this matter.
Login to explore more contents