average credit card fees of ~2.5% on merchants doesn’t sound like much
until you realize it’s basically a tax on all consumer commerce in the US
compare with average state sales tax rate of ~7.5%, but money which actually benefits your state and local communities
we’ve conditioned ourselves to pay a tax to a few payment processor companies
and in the past, they did provide unique value to both business and consumers, but it legitimately seems this may no longer be the case with the advent of onchain commerce
Coinbase was a “crypto company” which has become a “fintech company” looking to disrupt TradFi by using crypto/onchain rails to do so because it’s such a huge opportunity
expect their tone to change more and more to reflect this over time
stablecoins are blowing up on Base, and likely to gain even more traction with Shopify announcing their plans to use it for stablecoins. who knows, maybe Walmart or Amazon are next
and what do you notice here about bridged ETH and USDC on Base?
pretty similar USD amounts on there
*the growth of the stablecoin economy on Ethereum L2s will lead to the growth of the ETH economy alongside it*
this is the positive sum picture most people here can't see
more stablecoin activity on Ethereum -> more ETH-based activity on Ethereum
you are ALWAYS going to have people who disagree with your decisions in an org like the EF, especially when enacting culture change
the reality is a lot tough decisions have been made and still need to be made to ensure Ethereum remains competitive and the EF remains sustainable
i think the mindset which permeated the org under prior leadership led to the EF operating too much like a "job for life" rather than a competitive and responsive org ready to adapt to changes in the environment in which Ethereum operates. i will probably piss some people off by saying this, but that has been my view as an outsider for a while
the ideal EF model, imo, is one where you have continuity of mission and vision, but no individuals gain so much control that they can subjugate it in perverse ways. people should come, contribute to Ethereum being great, then go on into the ecosystem to add value to it based on that experience
so i must say that i'm truly impressed with the open and proactive comms approach @tkstanczak has been taking in his very short tenure. most people wouldn't realize how exceptional this is because these are not the kinds of things they think about
i do, and i can tell you this is exceptional
(source: 15+ years of working with senior execs on org design and strategy)
with fee burn in EIP-1559, Ethereum made a conscious decision to enrich ETH holders more than to enrich Ethereum Stakers specifically
this was done intentionally, to limit the amount of wealth stakers would accrue over time while distributing that benefit diffusely to all ETH holders instead in the form of net supply growth which is substantially lower than Bitcoin's or any other major L1 asset
Ethereum strives to be neutral, public infrastructure ANYONE can rely on much more than it tries to be a big tech corporation. its critics miss this and will keep missing it as the factor which makes Ethereum different
the value of ETH comes from it being used a a commodity money and store of value asset in that system. it is this use, and almost nothing else, which has given it a marketcap of $300B to $600B
this is just one of the many reasons why ETH is the best decentralized, programmable store of value asset in the entire world
that's not an opinion. it is just a fact, decided by the market
too much of the NFT space is people who are salty that you are not holding, buying, or talking about [theirBags]
it’s even worse if the stuff you are holding, buying, or talking about has had any kind of meaningful recognition or financial success while theirs perhaps haven’t had as much
so then it becomes this projection that the “problem with the space” is what everyone else chose to buy (or chose not to buy)- as if individual decisions to allocate their own capital are somehow destroying the space