#EOS基金会诈骗
EOS was once hailed as the "Ethereum killer," becoming a star project in the blockchain industry with its high TPS and DPoS consensus mechanism. However, years have passed, and EOS has not only failed to deliver on its promises, but has also become mired in centralization corruption, governance failures, and ecological collapse. The root of all this is the EOS Foundation — an institution that was supposed to represent community interests but ultimately devolved into a malignant entity of power monopoly, fund abuse, and ecological strangulation.
This article will expose the corrupt nature of the EOS Foundation, analyze its devastating impact on the EOS ecosystem, and discuss how to completely excise this tumor, allowing EOS to return to a decentralized trajectory.
1. The Corrupt Nature of the EOS Foundation
1. Power Monopoly:
From "Community Representative" to "Dictatorial Institution" The EOS Foundation, at its inception, claimed to promote community autonomy, but in reality, it quickly evolved into a bureaucratic institution with highly centralized power. - Decision-making black box: Key decisions (such as fund allocation and technical direction) are controlled by a few insiders, turning community voting into a formality. - Supernode Monopoly: The foundation colludes with exchanges and major holders to form a "supernode cartel," leaving ordinary token holders without a voice. - Governance Failure: In 2021, the EOS Foundation froze Block.one's assets, ostensibly in response to "community resistance," but in fact, it was an opportunity for the foundation to consolidate its own power.
2. Fund Abuse:
From "Ecological Support" to "Interest Transmission" The EOS Foundation holds vast amounts of funds but has failed to effectively support ecological development, instead becoming a breeding ground for corruption. - Unclear Fund Direction: Block.one once sold 160,000 bitcoins (worth over $1 billion), but the EOS Foundation failed to hold anyone accountable and did not disclose fund usage details. - Ineffective Investments: A large amount of investment was wasted, such as the "Web3 Bank" plan, renamed Vaulta in 2025, which has no technical feasibility and is merely a hype. - Internal Interest Transmission: Some senior executives of the foundation have been exposed as being linked to projects that received prioritized funding, while genuinely promising developers struggle to receive support.
3. Ecological Strangulation:
From "Prosperous Vision" to "Death Spiral" Under the "governance" of the EOS Foundation, the EOS ecosystem is gradually heading toward collapse: - Developer Exodus