Metaverses didn’t fail because the idea was weak.

They failed because they optimized for land sales, not lived experiences.

Somnia is pitching a different narrative: worlds that are interoperable, creator-driven, and backed by $SOMI as the economic glue. The pitch is strong. But the metaverse graveyard is full of strong pitches. The critique is whether Somnia can translate imagination into repeatable user behavior.

Reality Check:

1) SOMI sinks/sources must sustain creators, not just speculators.

2) Interop must be seamless, not an afterthought — fractured worlds are empty worlds.

3) Metric to track: creator revenue share vs. platform take rates over time.

The professional lens: web2 games thrive on content loops and economies aligned to player time. Web3 metaverses too often break this by focusing on speculation first.

Unless @Somnia Official designs #Somnia to reward creators who drive engagement, $SOMI risks being another token without purpose.

What Somnia could get right is flipping the script — treating worlds like composable apps, where assets and identities move frictionlessly. If that happens, $SOMI comes less a token and more an engine for experience liquidity.

Your move: what would actually keep you spending 15 minutes daily in a metaverse — social loops, real yield quests, or creator tools that pay back your time?