Somnia aims to solve not just the small matter of 'bringing games onto the chain,' but rather the larger issue of 'treating the chain like a real-time server for interactions.' It focuses on performance and development experience on parallelism and native execution: by using MultiStream to split verification responsibilities across multiple parallel streams, and then coordinating for final sorting and integration; while the contract side is compatible with Solidity, it leans towards native compilation and compact storage (such as engines like IceDB that are closer to high-frequency read/write), attempting to shorten the critical path from invocation to confirmation. For games and entertainment platforms, this orientation of 'making the ledger an event-driven real-time backend' is crucial: moving characters, firing decisions, item trading, and ticket verification are all extremely sensitive to latency, and the traditional 10-15 second endgame model is hard to satisfy. At the experience level, if Somnia wants to make 'blockchain invisible,' it needs to package session keys, gas sponsorship, batch settlements, and intent routing as default capabilities: users only declare actions and constraints, and the system takes responsibility to combine the shortest path and lowest cost in the background, providing predictable degradation strategies under the worst network conditions (such as extending windows, limiting single transactions, or switching to conservative channels). The creator economy is the second pillar: the value closed loop of virtual goods, scenes, and identities depends on 'verifiable contribution measurement - transparent profit-sharing paths - appealable royalty settlements.' If royalties are still enforceable in secondary markets and across applications, and can be replayed through on-chain events, then the willingness to create will form a sustained supply. The value capture of the token SOMI needs to be strongly bound to 'real interaction volume': according to public information, the network allocates transaction fees between verification and destruction; higher on-chain activity means stronger deflation and more stable validator revenue; at the same time, governance and fund usage should be incorporated into delayed execution and public auditing processes to reduce the harm of 'emotional proposals' on long-term stability. What needs to be cautious is the gap between 'benchmark performance - real concurrency' and the tension between 'anti-cheating - decentralization': if real-time interaction relies too heavily on quick endgames, node diversity and geographical distribution may be limited; if a more conservative confirmation strategy is adopted, smarter optimistic rendering and rollback compensation need to be implemented on the client experience side. To measure whether Somnia is on the right track, it is worth focusing on four indicators: P50/P95 confirmation latency for interactive transactions, concurrency and disconnection rates on the same server, actual enforcement rate of royalties in secondary markets, and the stability of wallet-side gasless sessions. Running through these 'heavy engineering facts' will bring the imagination of virtual society and on-chain entertainment to reality.@Somnia Official #Somnia $SOMI
