When discussions about $LUNC start, they often begin with “if”—and many of these “ifs” sound almost impossible. For example, some talk about burning 90% of the supply without fully grasping the magnitude—this would mean sacrificing billions of dollars. Who in their right mind, whether a company or a whale, would willingly burn such an enormous amount of capital just to potentially make a few holders, maybe you or me, millionaires? The reality is much harsher than the hopeful “ifs” we hear.
Let’s be realistic: the chances of burning billions on this scale are extremely slim. What is achievable, though, is for the community to build strong demand and hold a significant portion of the supply—ideally three-quarters or more—combined with a more modest burn percentage. This approach fosters genuine scarcity and supports upward price movement grounded in real user engagement and utility, rather than grand, unlikely gestures.
This is my personal take—rooted in practical observation—but I fully acknowledge that experts and thoughtful voices might see it differently. The key takeaway: sustainable growth for $LUNC depends largely on community strength and realistic supply dynamics, not on improbable scenarios.
