I remember once looking at the token distribution of a new project. The white paper had a lot written, but I still couldn't understand it. Was it concentrated in the hands of a few large holders? Was there potential risk? This uncertainty made me hesitate for a long time.
Later, I saw someone use Bubblemaps to visualize the funding distribution of this project, and the image immediately made it clear to me. Each bubble represents a different wallet address, with the size representing the holding amount, and connections made with lines. That intuitive feeling is much more effective than looking at numerical tables.
From that moment on, I began to understand the power of transparency. Bubblemaps does not tell you whether a project is good or bad, but allows the data to speak for itself. You can assess the concentration yourself, and you can clearly see if there are any unusual wallet behaviors. It's like getting a pair of 'x-ray glasses', no longer blinded by the complex token distribution. For users, this brings reassurance, and for project parties, it is also a form of self-evidence.
