🧭 Introduction

In the car analogy, BUIDL/BENJI is the "hybrid system with stable torque", LCT is the "legally registered license plate", and dual-token PoS is the "chassis and safety beam". To determine who is more suitable for long-distance driving, you can't just look at horsepower; you have to consider the overall vehicle integration. BounceBit's selling point is that it creates a monocoque frame for RWA collateral, on-chain strategies, BTC re-staking security, and EVM execution, rather than an external modification.



🧱 Structural Foundation (What is BounceBit)

BTC + $BB dual-token PoS L1, EVM compatible, CeDeFi asset pathway—The official website and Docs clearly state: users deposit assets under compliant custody, receive LCT on-chain, earn CeFi interest while using it as collateral or re-staking on-chain; the main network provides economic security through combined staking of BTC and $BB ; developers continue to use the Solidity toolchain, and strategies can execute locally.



🏦 Prime (RWA × Strategy)

BENJI has been integrated, and BUIDL has completed collateralization—In August 2025, Franklin Templeton's BENJI was officially integrated into Prime, with passive coupon interest available as primary collateral or settlement assets; in May of the same year, BlackRock's BUIDL was used as collateral for Bitcoin derivatives strategy trials, yielding higher returns than similar strategies collateralized with stablecoins, because "collateral earns interest simultaneously". Both prove that RWA is no longer just a warehouse, but a primary fuel for strategy engines.



🆚 Comparison with similar services

  • Ondo: the leader in tokenized government bonds, focusing on "the asset itself"; if you want to run structured strategies, you still need external execution layers and risk control, with no natural hooks for BTC re-staking—Babylon: transferring the economic security of BTC to

  • the PoS ecosystem, suitable for "security as a service", but does not solve the integration of "RWA collateral + on-chain strategies".

  • EigenLayer/Symbiotic: a shared security market for the Ethereum ecosystem, suitable for ETH ecosystem AVS, RWA and BTC asset utilization needs to seek other components—Merlin Chain/BEVM: BTC L2 oriented, focusing on execution and development convenience, but RWA × CeDeFi is not the core route—BounceBit's advantage lies in clearly reconciling the authenticity of RWA with LCT + custody, integrating security and execution with dual-token PoS + EVM, and directly turning BENJI/BUIDL into strategy collateral with Prime, minimizing assembly and maximizing native.

[Each project's goals are different; choose based on your risk control and compliance needs.]



🔍 Why using "BounceBit" is more worry-free in practice

Governance disclosure and asset reconciliation are interconnected—CEFFU's MirrorX and the official LCT process provide accounting consistency with "assets in custody and certificates on-chain"; the Prime side's access to BENJI/BUIDL and strategy explanations can be verified through media and official communications; developers use ready-made tools from the EVM ecosystem; investors only need to focus on three things: Prime asset disclosure, LCT reconciliation, and cost and revenue distribution. When all three are consistently upward, what you see is not a one-time activity but a systematic path of "cash flow → token demand".



🧯 Risk and Calibration

The counterparty and legal domain of RWA is the ceiling; repurchase/burn must be regulated—any RWA collection must refer to the fund recruitment disclosure and custody disclosure; any revenue commitment must have an execution address and reporting frequency; any token economics of "repurchase/burn" should ideally be written into governance automation rules. Your practical operational guidelines are to convert "news" into three indicators: whether disclosure documents are traceable, whether LCT 1:1 is stable, and whether Prime's costs/revenues are continuous.



— This article does not constitute investment advice

$BB @BounceBit #BounceBitPrime #RWA