$BMT : Participating in community governance is not a gimmick, it can truly decide the direction of the platform

Many projects' "community governance" is just a gimmick; user votes do not count. However, the governance power of BMT is genuine—important decisions of the platform must be voted on and approved by BMT holders to be valid.

For example, which new chain should the platform support? Should it first focus on visualizing the Solana chain, or should it prioritize Avalanche? BMT holders vote to decide; if the platform wants to adjust the survey reward ratios, should it increase the proposal submitter's reward or the detective's reward? That also requires a vote. Previously, a user proposed to "lower the BMT threshold for newcomers submitting clues"; after submitting the governance proposal, most $BMT holders voted in favor, and not long after, the platform changed the rules, allowing more newcomers to participate.

Holding $BMT is not just about "utilizing features"; you can also "set the rules". What you say can truly influence the direction of the platform, and this sense of participation is not something ordinary tokens can provide. #Bubblemaps @Bubblemaps.io