Why is TON the cornerstone of the $NOT payment scenario?

One of the most discussed topics on Binance recently is the development of the TON ecosystem and NOT. Many people ask: Why is NOT considered the touchstone for TON payment applications?

💡 Simple understanding: Payment tokens need to have high performance + high liquidity + high consensus. $TON provides performance, NOT is responsible for consensus, and liquidity comes from being listed on multiple exchanges.

📊 Professional analysis:

TON achieved tens of thousands of TPS in recent tests, which is a prerequisite for the popularization of small payments.

The number of NOT holding users exceeds 2.8 million, and 61% of the supply is on-chain, possessing a natural "distribution breadth."

Listed on 15 exchanges including Binance, OKX, and Bybit, ensuring the instant liquidity of assets.

This structure gives NOT the potential to serve as the "consumer-side token" in the TON ecosystem, corresponding to the "settlement-side role" of USDT.

Speaking for myself, I am optimistic about $NOT becoming a small payment token, but I will not use it as a "store of value" for the time being, because volatility still exists.

Would you accept using a game token to pay for a coffee?

@The Notcoin Official #Notcoin

#MooKing See you next time in the small classroom!