WalletConnect in enterprise scenarios cannot avoid auditing and permission domain models. Unlike consumer-grade, enterprises care more about 'who did what action at what time with what permissions, whether it can be revoked, and whether it can be traced back to the module level.' To make the connection layer become 'a utility like water and electricity,' we need to fold the three layers of session, permission, and auditing into a traceable track: clearly define the namespace and permission domain when establishing a session, and all subsequent actions advance along the same track, interruptions can be recovered, and permissions can be tightened instantly.
It is extremely important to create an attribution tree for failure codes: separate auto-recoverable links from those requiring user actions, list paths that must be rolled back separately, and configure prompts and alert levels for each path. Conduct a 'discontinuous rollback' drill before going live, recording recovery time, user perceptibility, and the integrity of the audit logs. Only when these 'trivial' tasks are executed consistently will the connection disappear from the user's view, allowing the upper-level experience to be seen.
The risks of the connection layer are proportionally magnified: any security incident will strike at the foundation, and protocol fragmentation will increase access costs. Version locks, gray releases, and rollback lists are the minimal respect in engineering. The value of WalletConnect is to exchange long-term stability for innovation space.
