ERA: The 'Intermediary Economics' of the Crypto World
In the crypto world, everyone loves to brag about how fast they are:
Arbitrum: I'm fast!
zkSync: I'm even faster!
Optimism: I'm not slow either!
So, what’s the result?
Users still have to switch wallets back and forth, cross-chain bridges are still lagging, and the experience is as bad as an internet cafe from ten years ago.
Enter ERA: Not competing with you on TPS
ERA isn't racing against everyone on speed; it plays by a different logic:
"You all love to build roads, go ahead, I'll build the overpass."
Thus we have Metalayer:
Allowing Rollups to interconnect,
Users no longer need to mess around for ages,
Developers can also freely assemble modules.
ERA doesn't compete on performance; it competes on relationships and experience.
Token logic: Only valuable if used frequently
$ERA isn't making empty promises:
If you want to cross Rollup → Pay Gas
Nodes must run → Must stake
Governance voting → Depends on it
Ecosystem incentives → Still depends on it
To put it simply, the value of ERA isn't in words, but in whether people are actually using it.
Crypto Observation Perspective
In my view, ERA is a bit like that reliable intermediary:
It doesn't steal the spotlight, but without it, things just don't work smoothly.
It doesn’t sprint, but lays down pipelines.
The stage is set large enough, and stars will naturally come to perform.
💡 Summary
@Caldera Official isn't here to compare speed with anyone; it's here to be the intermediary of the 'Rollup Internet.'
In the crypto world, those who can connect relationships often end up being the real winners.
— Crypto Observation
