🔥 The story about the "LEVERAGE" that causes intense controversy, right guys? Does "big leverage and small leverage" decide the winning rate or make you "addicted"?

For me, "Leverage is Not the Deciding Factor" but rather Margin Volume.

*Note: Margin Volume is different from Position Volume!

- Margin Volume is the amount of money not including leverage

- Position Volume is the margin amount * leverage

Continuing... I apply leverage and volume as follows:

- BTC/ETH/SOL (Leverage X50-100 volume 0.5-2%)

- All Altcoins (Leverage X15-25 (1-3.5%)

- Lottery/Swing (Leverage x3-x10)

🔹 BTC and ETH or SOL have short volatility, I trade or signal often tell everyone to calculate by Price and R. Because with a range of 1500 in price for BTC at 1.4%, applying high leverage only looks good. Especially, have you ever seen me flaunt a ROI of 300-500% or a few thousand? There is some jam… so if you intend to make one sentence a two-sentence chicken chase, then stuff that rag into your mouth.

Continuing to calculate volume according to normal orders:

- Order 500$ leverage x20 = 1 order 100$ leverage x100 with ~ volatility price the actual amount is the same, only the ROI is different

- Don't blame high leverage for the big losses

🔸 The issue of high or low leverage is not the problem. What everyone needs to care about is how much money you are currently margin trading and what percentage the margin amount occupies. As for leverage, it does not decide

🔸 Depending on the code, depending on the existing orders and trading volatility. The most important thing is for you guys to calculate volume yourself. If you are careless, you blame it on leverage, saying you are addicted to futures due to high leverage. Then why not calculate carefully, discipline, and limit the amount of money in. Addiction can be seen with the eye. Then that’s it… do you want to argue anymore so I can post, we combat again 😋