In the Web3 ecosystem, users often know their on-chain assets “what they are but not why” — they know they hold 10 types of tokens but are unclear about “which are ‘healthy assets’ and which hide ‘devaluation risks’”; they hold multiple NFTs but do not know “whether the collections are ‘subhealthy’ and when they might ‘drop in value’.” Traditional tools only display “asset quantity” without assessing “asset health,” causing users’ assets to be like “a body that hasn’t had a regular check-up,” missing the opportunity to adjust when problems are discovered. Bubblemaps breaks out of the “asset counting” mindset, centering on “asset examination,” and pioneers the “on-chain asset health assessment system,” providing a comprehensive examination of assets from three major dimensions: “safety, growth, and liquidity,” generating “examination reports + adjustment plans,” allowing users to optimize asset structure in a timely manner and avoid “assets getting sick.”
1. “Safety Examination”: Identify the asset’s “invisible risk hazards.”
The “safety” of assets is fundamental — if a certain token has a risk of the project running away, if a certain NFT is associated with a fraudulent address, or if a certain mining pool contract has vulnerabilities, these “invisible risks” can lead to asset zeroing if not discovered in time. Bubblemaps’ “safety examination module” scans from three perspectives: “underlying associations, contract status, and address risk,” like conducting a “CT scan” to identify hidden dangers.
The examination will generate a “risk list”:
• Token Assets: If a certain token has “the project address transferring more than 20% of the circulating amount to exchanges in the last 7 days,” it is marked as “High Risk: The project may cash out, suggesting reducing the position to below 5%.” If a certain stablecoin has “a reserve ratio lower than 80%,” it indicates “Medium Risk: The stability of the peg is questionable, recommending partial exchange for compliant stablecoins.”
• NFT Assets: If a certain NFT has “30% of holders as ‘one-time wash addresses’,” it is marked as “Medium Risk: Consensus is false, and it may go unsold later. It is recommended to cash out in time.” If a certain NFT “has a non-open-sourced contract and no audit,” it is flagged as “High Risk: There may be a minting backdoor, and long-term holding is not recommended.”
• Mining Pool/Staking Assets: If a certain mining pool has “a 50% drop in new users over the last 3 days and continuous outflow of TVL,” it is marked as “High Risk: It may face a run on the bank, and it is recommended to redeem the principal immediately.” After examination, a user found that a certain niche token they held had “the project address marked as ‘high-risk runaway address’,” selling it that day avoided subsequent losses from “token zeroing.”
2. “Growth Examination”: Assess the asset’s “appreciation potential level.”
Users often mix “zombie assets” in their holdings — a certain token has long plateaued without ecological progress, or a certain NFT has had no linked activities since its launch, occupying funds with no potential for appreciation. Bubblemaps’ “growth examination engine” assesses asset appreciation potential based on “ecological progress, funding attention, and community vitality,” classifying it into three levels: “High Quality (A), Average (B), Poor (C).”
The examination dimensions are clearly defined:
• Token Growth Potential: If a certain token “has gained 5 new ecological DApps in the last 3 months, with institutional investment exceeding $10 million, and small to medium wallets growing by 30% per month,” it is rated as Class A, suggesting “can increase holdings to 15% of total assets.” If a certain token “has had no ecological updates for 6 months, with zero fund inflow,” it is rated as Class C, suggesting “recommend clearing the position to release funds for high-growth assets.”
• NFT Growth Potential: If a certain NFT has “collaborated with 2 game projects, with 70% of holdings from old players and continuous accumulation, and the official updates the collection rights every month,” it is rated as Class A, suggesting “long-term holding, as there may be appreciation of rights in the future.” If a certain NFT “has had no community activities since launch, with trading frequency dropping by 80% per month,” it is rated as Class C, suggesting “sell promptly to avoid liquidity exhaustion.” A user cleared out three Class C “zombie tokens” from their holdings and invested in two Class A tokens, resulting in a total asset appreciation of 60% after three months.
3. “Liquidity Examination”: Evaluate the asset’s “liquidation capability health.”
In Web3, assets with “poor liquidity” are like “hard-to-sell real estate” — unable to sell when urgent cash is needed, no one to take over when wanting to adjust positions, and even experiencing the awkwardness of “a good-looking floor price but zero transactions.” Bubblemaps’ “liquidity examination function” assesses asset liquidation capability based on “trading depth, transaction frequency, and cross-chain liquidity,” marking “liquidity levels” and “liquidation suggestions.”
Key focus of the examination:
• Token Liquidity: If a token has “more than $100 million in transaction volume on mainstream exchanges in the last 24 hours and sufficient buy-sell depth (1% price fluctuation can transact $1 million),” it is rated as “High Liquidity,” indicating “it can be quickly liquidated when cash is needed, suitable as the ‘flexible part’ of asset allocation.” If a token “is only listed on 1 niche exchange with a transaction volume of less than $100,000 in the last 24 hours,” it is rated as “Low Liquidity,” suggesting “gradually reduce the position to avoid significant discounts during urgent sales.”
• NFT Liquidity: If an NFT has “more than 50 transactions in the last 24 hours and over 30 orders near the floor price,” it is rated as “High Liquidity,” indicating “it can be sold within an hour when cashing out, without needing to significantly lower the price.” If an NFT “has only 2 transactions in the last 7 days and no one is interested in hanging orders,” it is rated as “Low Liquidity,” suggesting “use 'limited-time discounts' or 'ecological benefits' to attract buyers and avoid long-term idleness.” A user’s examination found that the liquidity of a certain NFT they held had dropped to “extremely low,” and they quickly matched it with conditions of “giving away peripheral derivatives,” successfully selling it within 3 days, avoiding the subsequent dual loss of “floor price plummeting + no buyer.”
Summary
From scanning for risk hazards in the “safety examination,” to filtering appreciating assets in the “growth examination,” and then to ensuring liquidation capability in the “liquidity examination,” Bubblemaps transforms Web3 users’ asset management from “blind holding” to “scientific adjustment.” It is no longer a “simple asset statistical tool,” but the user’s “on-chain asset private doctor” — helping users regularly check asset health, adjust configurations in a timely manner, and ensure that every asset can “appreciate healthily,” truly achieving “long-term stability” for Web3 assets.@Bubblemaps.io
