Is @Lagrange Official the real key to cross-chain interoperability?
Introduction:
In the past, cross-chain bridges were one of the biggest black holes in the crypto world. Almost every year, hundreds of millions of dollars were stolen by hackers. Thus, a question is posed to everyone: Is there really no better solution for cross-chain interoperability?
@Lagrange Official provides its own answer: replacing the mechanism that relies on validators with decentralized cross-chain proof. The “State Committee + ZK Verification” model it builds allows one chain to verify the state of another chain without trusting a third party.
What does this mean? It means that cross-chain communication can be as stable and secure as an API, rather than accompanied by the risk of funds being stolen. Especially today, as modular public chains become more numerous, this capability could become the “real key to interoperability.”
However, it’s important to remain calm; cross-chain verification is not a completely new proposition. Cosmos IBC has already achieved similar goals, but it relies on heavier inter-chain consensus. Lagrange’s solution is theoretically lighter, but whether it can withstand the test of large-scale applications still needs time to verify.
DORO's famous saying: There are no shortages of bridges in cross-chain, but what is lacking is a secure bridge. @Lagrange Official wants to build this key, but the lock is too complex; whether it can match is still uncertain.
