they don't understand how burning works, right? if these people feel like it. burn as much as you want today. you can burn 50% today but it wouldn't be good for the project itself.

$Jager 🚫 The major brake: whales will not enter

Big investors, those we call "whales," are the volume drivers in any cryptocurrency. However, a whale will never buy an asset that makes them lose:
5% right at the entry
5% at the exit

In practice, this means that a whale would need to wait for an increase of +11% just to break even. On tens or hundreds of millions, this is prohibitive. As a result: unlike PEPE or SHIBA, Jager cannot attract large speculative capital.

Why the volume will decrease over time

Let's compare with famous meme tokens:
PEPE and SHIBA have no taxes → they can be listed on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, which causes their volume to explode.
Jager, due to its tax system, will never be able to enter these platforms.

Result: its volume remains limited to DEX and a few small CEX. And as time goes on, the initial enthusiasm diminishes.

The burn numbers
Initial supply: 14.6 quadrillions
Burn in 1 year: 0.905 quadrillion (≈ 6.2 %)
Current supply: ≈ 13.7 quadrillions

If we maintain this constant pace (theoretical assumption), it would take:
≈ 15 years to burn everything
≈ 7,500 years to reduce by half (because the supply is monstrous)

Simulation with decreasing volume

But the reality is worse: the burn depends on the volume.
If the volume decreases by only 20% per year (which is common for this type of token), then after 4 years, the annual burn becomes almost insignificant.
In this scenario, the supply would still be around 12-13 quadrillions, meaning barely a few percent burned additionally.

Conclusion

The idea that Jager could burn one third, half, or even the entirety of its supply is a mathematical illusion.
Without whales, there is no large volume.
Without volume, there is no burn.
Without burn, there is no effective deflationary mechanism.