MooKing Honestly｜Can Intel Desk Really Prevent the Next 'Harvesting Scheme'?

When it comes to the recent hot topics of discussion surrounding Binance, what everyone fears the most is a surge in hype that ultimately leads to the old routine of 'the house harvesting retail investors.' YZY is a typical case of this, and the community has been abuzz with discussions.

The value of Bubblemaps lies in making token distribution transparent, preventing project teams from 'pretending to be decentralized.' Moreover, Intel Desk puts the investigation process in the hands of the community, using $BMT votes to determine resource allocation, which is a form of Decentralized Intel Market.

The question is, can Intel Desk truly prevent 'harvesting schemes'? Strictly speaking, it is not a 'preventer,' but rather a 'discloser': when data visuals are made public, the market will be quicker to recognize risks, thereby reducing the chances of being harvested.

As for myself, MooKing, I believe this is not a cure-all, but at least it's much better than blind guessing. I will continue to use $BMT votes because transparency itself is a form of weapon.

What about you? Do you believe in the power of the community to suppress the house, or do you think this is just a superficial remedy?

@Bubblemaps.io | #Bubblemaps | $BMT

#MooKing See you in the next small classroom!