MooKing Risk Magnifier｜BounceBit Prime vs Other RWA, Who Has the Deeper Pit?

Binance players have recently been enthusiastic about RWA, but everyone overlooks one point: the risks vary significantly across different platforms.

A: BounceBit Prime, through CEFFU custody and collaboration with major institutions, has the risk of "policy and regulatory changes." If a regulatory order is issued, profits may be blocked.

B: Other decentralized protocol RWAs have more risks: including doubts about asset authenticity, unclear liquidation mechanisms, and tokenized assets that may not be redeemable.

In simple terms: A is "a legitimate investment opportunity that could suddenly be halted"; B is "high returns but you don’t know if the chips are counterfeit money."

There is market enthusiasm on both sides: on-chain data shows that type B #RWA is growing rapidly, but the community has higher expectations for the stability of type A BounceBit Prime.

As for myself in MooKing, I would diversify my holdings, neither fully betting on A nor completely on B, because I don’t want to become a "victim of regulatory blockage" or "a retail investor unable to redeem assets."

What would you do? Hand your money to Wall Street, or trust the promises of decentralized protocols?

@BounceBit | #BounceBitPrime | $BB

#MooKing See you in the next class!