Having been in the crypto circle for a long time, I often feel a sense of powerlessness: when a project launches, the big holders and institutions have already filled their bags, and by the time we ordinary people come in, there's often just a mess left behind. Over time, everyone knows that often 'fairness' is just a slogan.

But in the process of paying attention to Huma Finance, I suddenly felt that perhaps some projects are really striving for balance. For example, the allocation of $HUMA is not the kind of model where institutions hold most of the shares, but rather consciously leaves a considerable proportion for ecosystem incentives and the community. In other words, as an ordinary holder, you won't feel like you're always at the bottom of the food chain.

I like this feeling. It makes me feel like I'm not a 'follower', but a participant. What you buy is not just a token, but a way to engage in the construction of the entire ecosystem. Especially in the community, when everyone votes and discusses, that atmosphere of equality feels very real. Whales may have more votes, but the voices of small investors can also be heard.

I remember a friend once said: 'A good project is not measured by how much big holders can earn, but by whether small investors can hold their positions with peace of mind.' This statement resonated with me. Because for most people, trust and a sense of belonging are more important than short-term surges.

Huma Finance has given me such resonance: it has not forgotten ordinary users but has included us as part of the ecosystem. For me, this feeling of being seen may be the most important reason to stay with a project long-term.

@Huma Finance 🟣