Currently, the Web3 Meme coin ecosystem faces three types of key security technical challenges in the process of business scenario expansion and role collaboration: first, scenario-based security needs have not been accurately covered, such as the disconnection of security protection and business processes in high-frequency scenarios like community interaction, asset custody, and cross-chain verification; second, the collaboration of ecological roles (project parties, security nodes, infrastructure service providers) remains at the data level and has not formed deep process linkage; third, the integration of security technologies and Meme coin business processes (e.g., token issuance, liquidity management, user registration) is insufficient, leading to 'business blind spots' in protection. Bubblemaps relies on three core designs: scenario-based security capability disassembly system, deep collaboration mechanism of ecological roles, and security-business process integration embedding solution, to construct a security support system for the Meme coin ecosystem from three dimensions: scenario adaptation, collaboration deepening, and business integration, focusing on the practicality, collaborative granularity, and business embedding of security technology, aligning with the core demands of the industry for the practicality and depth of the security system.
1. Scenario-based security capability disassembly system: Precise protection covering high-frequency scenarios.
The business scenarios of the Meme coin ecosystem are becoming increasingly diversified, with significant differences in security risk characteristics and protection needs across different scenarios (e.g., community security interaction, asset custody, cross-chain verification)—the community scenario needs to guard against security misjudgments caused by the spread of false information, the asset custody scenario needs to ensure the security of private keys and assets, and the cross-chain verification scenario needs to ensure the legality of inter-chain asset interactions. Traditional security solutions are mostly 'general protection' and cannot match scenario-based risk characteristics. The scenario-based security capability disassembly system built by Bubblemaps provides customized security support for each type of high-frequency scenario through the logic of 'scenario risk profiling - security capability disassembly - technical solution adaptation'.
The core scenario and technical adaptation design of the system includes:
• Community security interaction scenario: Addressing the characteristics of the Meme coin ecosystem where 'community information spreads quickly and users are easily influenced by unofficial information', disassembling core security needs into 'information authenticity verification', 'official directive verification', and 'risk information early warning'. In terms of technical solutions, developing a 'community security information verification module' that supports real-time compliance checks on links disseminated within the community (e.g., project official website, trading links), automatically identifying counterfeit domains and phishing links; simultaneously constructing an 'official directive signature verification tool', requiring that key operational guidance issued by the project party (e.g., contract upgrade notifications, asset migration announcements) be signed on-chain, allowing users to verify the validity of the signature through the tool before executing operations, avoiding security risks caused by false directives.
• Asset custody protection scenario: For the asset custody needs of users and project parties, disassembling core security needs into 'private key secure storage', 'asset operation authorization', and 'abnormal operation interception'. In terms of technical solutions, providing a 'distributed multi-signature custody module' that supports users to custody assets in a multi-signature wallet, setting multi-role authorization thresholds (e.g., 2/3 signatures take effect) to avoid asset loss caused by a single private key leak; simultaneously developing an 'asset operation behavior analysis tool' that establishes a baseline based on historical operation habits (e.g., operation time, device information, transaction amount range), which automatically triggers secondary verification or temporary interception when detecting operations deviating from the baseline (e.g., login from a remote device, large asset transfer).
• Cross-chain verification process scenario: For the problems of 'asynchronous data between chains and difficulty in verifying asset ownership' in Meme coin cross-chain interactions, disassembling core security needs into 'cross-chain asset legality verification', 'inter-chain data consistency verification', and 'cross-chain operation tracing'. In terms of technical solutions, adopting a 'cross-chain node consensus verification mechanism', jointly verifying the asset transfer information with the security nodes of both sides involved in the cross-chain transaction to ensure the ownership and legality of cross-chain assets; simultaneously constructing a 'cross-chain operation log chain' that stores all process data such as cross-chain initiation, verification, and receipt on-chain, supporting real-time traceability queries, and avoiding asset disputes caused by cross-chain data tampering or loss.
The core value of this system lies in improving the identification and interception accuracy of scenario-based risks, increasing the security risk coverage rate of high-frequency scenarios to over 90%, and reducing the response time to scenario-based security incidents by over 85%.
2. Deep collaboration mechanism of ecological roles: Process linkage that goes beyond data interconnection.
In the Meme coin ecosystem, the collaboration among project parties, security nodes (such as third-party security agencies and verification nodes within the ecosystem), and infrastructure service providers (wallets, trading platforms) often stays at the level of 'security data sharing', failing to form a full-process linkage of 'risk identification - rule formulation - execution - effect feedback'—after the security node discovers a risk, it only pushes data, and the rule adjustments of project parties and infrastructure lack collaboration, leading to delayed protective responses. The deep collaboration mechanism designed by Bubblemaps among ecological roles achieves full-process security collaboration among ecological roles through the design of 'role responsibility disassembly - process node linkage - effect closed-loop feedback'.
The core design of the mechanism includes:
• Disassembly of role responsibilities and process nodes: Clarifying the core responsibilities of each role and process nodes in security collaboration.
◦ Security node: Responsible for real-time monitoring of on-chain risks (e.g., abnormal transaction patterns, contract call anomalies), generating risk feature tags, and proposing security rule optimization suggestions.
◦ Project party: Responsible for formulating security rules based on risk characteristics (e.g., risk address interception list, contract operation thresholds) and synchronizing with infrastructure service providers.
◦ Infrastructure service providers: Responsible for embedding security rules into their business processes (e.g., address interception in wallets, risk control strategies on trading platforms) and providing feedback on the effectiveness of rule execution (e.g., number of interceptions, false positive rates).
• Real-time process linkage engine: Constructing a real-time linkage chain of 'risk identification - rule formulation - execution - feedback'. When a security node detects a new risk, it generates a standardized risk feature report within 10 seconds and pushes it to the project party; the project party completes security rule adjustments based on the report within 30 minutes, synchronizing through the engine to all integrated infrastructure service providers; infrastructure service providers complete rule deployment within 1 hour and return execution data (e.g., interception volume, user feedback) to the engine in real-time, forming a closed loop of processes.
• Collaborative governance and rule optimization: Establishing an 'Ecological Security Collaborative Governance Committee', proportionally involving project parties, security nodes, and infrastructure service providers, to regularly (e.g., monthly) optimize security rule formulation standards (e.g., risk level determination thresholds) and process linkage timeliness requirements (e.g., maximum synchronization time for rules) based on execution data of process linkage, ensuring that the collaborative mechanism continues to iterate with ecological development.
The implementation of this mechanism can significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of ecological security collaboration, reducing the full process time from risk identification to protection implementation to less than 2 hours, and decreasing the misjudgment rate of security rule execution by over 60%, avoiding delays in protection caused by gaps in role collaboration.
3. Security-business process integration embedding solution: Deep protection to eliminate business blind spots.
In the Meme coin ecosystem, security technologies are often independent of business processes (e.g., token issuance, liquidity management, user registration), leading to 'security blind spots' in business links—security checks on contract parameters are not conducted during token issuance, dynamic risk monitoring is lacking during liquidity management, and the establishment of a secure identity baseline is not done during user registration. The security-business process integration embedding solution developed by Bubblemaps eliminates protection blind spots by deeply integrating security capabilities into the entire business process through the logic of 'business process disassembly - security node embedding - technical solution integration'.
The core business process and security embedding design of the solution includes:
• Token issuance process: Disassembling the core links of token issuance (contract development, parameter configuration, on-chain deployment, online verification), embedding security nodes in each link. During the contract development phase, embedding a 'contract code security scanning plugin' to detect logical vulnerabilities and permission defects in real-time; during the parameter configuration phase, embedding a 'parameter security verification module' to conduct compliance and security checks on key parameters such as total token supply, decimal precision, and mint permissions, avoiding security risks caused by incorrect parameter configurations; during the on-chain deployment phase, embedding a 'deployment process monitoring tool' to record deployment addresses, block heights, and other information, ensuring that the deployment process has no abnormal interference.
• Liquidity management process: For the creation, expansion, and parameter adjustment of Meme coin liquidity pools, embedding security monitoring and control nodes. When creating liquidity pools, embedding a 'pool parameter security assessment module' to evaluate the reasonableness of initial liquidity scale and transaction fee rate settings, avoiding liquidity anomalies caused by unreasonable parameters; during liquidity expansion, embedding an 'expansion operation verification mechanism' that requires multi-role authorization (e.g., project party + security node) and records on-chain logs; in daily management, embedding a 'liquidity dynamic monitoring module' to monitor the inflow and outflow of the liquidity pool in real time, as well as changes in transaction slippage, automatically triggering alerts and supporting temporary trading pauses when unusual fluctuations occur (e.g., a sudden drop in liquidity within a short time).
• User registration and interaction process: Embedding security identity and behavior baseline nodes in user registration, asset addition, and transaction authorization stages. During user registration, embedding a 'security identity initialization module' to guide users to complete wallet security configurations (e.g., private key backup, enabling secondary verification) and establish an initial security identity baseline; when users add assets, embedding an 'asset legality verification module' to verify the compliance of the asset contract address, avoiding the addition of counterfeit tokens; when users initiate transaction authorization, embedding an 'authorization behavior risk assessment module' to assess risks based on users' historical authorization habits (e.g., types of authorized contracts, range of authorization amounts), requiring high-risk authorizations to trigger secondary verification.
The core value of this solution lies in eliminating security blind spots in business processes, increasing the security coverage of the entire Meme coin business process to over 95%, and reducing the occurrence rate of risk events caused by security deficiencies in business links by over 75%.
Future: The 'scenario-based segmentation' and 'ecological collaboration standardization' of security will become core directions.
The core breakthrough of Bubblemaps lies in breaking away from the traditional model of 'separation of security and business', achieving the deep integration of the Meme coin ecosystem's security from three dimensions: scenario adaptation, role collaboration, and business integration—covering precise needs through scenario-based disassembly, improving collaboration efficiency through deep role interaction, and embedding security measures to eliminate protection blind spots based on business integration, while always focusing on the practicality and ecological adaptability of security technology.
From the perspective of industry development trends, as the Meme coin ecosystem scenario becomes further segmented (e.g., integration with on-chain social interactions, lightweight games), and ecological role division becomes further specialized (e.g., the emergence of dedicated security verification nodes and scenario-based security service providers), 'security scenario segmentation', 'ecological collaboration standardization', and 'business integration deepening' will become the mainstream direction in the industry. It is expected that Bubblemaps will further deepen its technical path: on one hand, expanding the coverage of scenario-based security capabilities (e.g., adding 'on-chain social security module' and 'lightweight game scenario security module'); on the other hand, promoting the industry standardization of ecological role collaboration mechanisms, uniting more Web3 ecosystem participants to collaboratively formulate rules, ultimately building a Meme coin ecological security network of 'full scenario coverage, full role linkage, and full business integration', providing a reference paradigm for the deep implementation of the industry security system.
