Value Logic of $PROVE
Many people only focus on the technology when looking at projects, but I believe that whether a project can go far depends on its economic model. The $PROVE of @Succinct gives me the impression that its logic is very clear.
In the DPN network, for validators to participate, they must stake $PROVE. This is equivalent to a 'deposit system' that ensures they won’t casually submit incorrect proofs, or else they will face penalties. This way, the security of the entire network has an economic constraint.
At the same time, @Succinct has designed a 'proof competition.' Multiple validators compute simultaneously, and the fastest and correct one receives a reward. This mechanism not only improves efficiency but also forms a market-oriented pricing method. Those who compute faster or better can earn more.
This means that as more applications arise (cross-chain bridges, DeFi, compliance audits, privacy computing, etc.), the demand for proofs will only increase, and the demand for tokens will continue to rise. In other words, $PRO$PROVE tokens are not just the core of the entire network's operation.
This is the logic I like: value is driven not by speculation but by real demand.
