Security is not given for free. Solayer connects the asset layer of sSOL on one end and the validation layer of Mega Validator on the other; the official claims that this validator uses customized hardware and software optimizations, along with added MEV yields, as the 'engine' of the protocol. For users, this means that the closed loop of 'underlying security—upper layer yield' is more stable.
The more aggressive side is the InfiniSVM (hardware-accelerated SVM, multi-execution clusters, interconnected through SDN/RDMA) that Solayer is exploring. This route attempts to push Solana's parallel execution further, with documents and white papers (litepaper) continuously updating the system architecture details—from the shared and irrelevant architecture of SVM to network stack optimization. Although this is 'cutting-edge R&D', its direction is very clear: to increase the 'load-bearing' capacity of verification and execution.
Why is it related to re-staking? Because when the number of AVS increases and each AVS has more tasks, the underlying verification/execution capacity becomes a 'supply bottleneck'. If validators and the execution stack can handle higher concurrency, the 'orders' of AVS can be digested on time, and the accounting of sSOL yields will also be more linear. This is the key bridge to transform 'technical capacity' into 'financial availability'.
Risks and boundaries must be clarified: 'top validators' are not a permanent title, as performance varies with the network and delegation; MEV yields have periodic cycles; hardware acceleration must balance cost and decentralized distribution. For end users, maintaining the three aspects of 'verifiable, retrievable, and reconcilable' is a more reliable standard for assessing whether re-staking is healthy.
The security supply of Solayer does not rely solely on 'locking more SOL', but rather on a combined effort in verification, execution, MEV, and hardware levels, ensuring that the upper-layer AVS has stable 'power' available.
@Solayer #BuiltonSolayer $LAYER