Former Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has sharply criticized the West’s ongoing support for Ukraine, questioning the logic and fairness behind the commitments made by European nations.
Speaking on the matter, Fico sarcastically remarked that Slovakia would first need to buy weapons from the United States with its own money—only to hand them over to Ukraine for free. His statement was made in response to the recent pledge of continued security support for Kyiv.
A Pointed Critique
Fico’s comment reflects a broader skepticism in parts of Europe regarding the burden of military aid to Ukraine. Many governments, already facing inflation and economic stress, are under pressure to justify billions in military and financial assistance flowing eastward.
By highlighting the indirect cost—purchasing U.S. weapons only to give them away—Fico underscored what he views as the one-sided nature of the arrangement that benefits U.S. arms manufacturers while straining smaller European economies.
Broader European Debate
His remarks add to the ongoing debate within the EU and NATO:
Should European taxpayers continue to bear the weight of Ukraine’s defense?
Is the current model sustainable, or is it disproportionately favoring American defense contractors?
Could such aid commitments weaken domestic stability in smaller European states?
Conclusion
While many Western leaders remain steadfast in their backing of Ukraine, voices like Robert Fico’s reveal growing discontent with the cost-sharing structure of the war effort. His sarcasm serves as a warning that, for some European nations, unwavering support for Ukraine may come at a political price at home.