One of the biggest headaches for dApps, exchanges, and market makers is the fragmentation of funds. If an asset has mappings in both Rollup A and Rollup B, there may be the same name but different tokens; liquidity cannot be unified, leading to a poor user experience. The solution proposed by ERA is 'unique mapping + shared settlement.'
The so-called unique mapping refers to implementing a standard path to avoid 'ghost balances' and 'double spending.' At the same time, ERA introduces shared settlement assets, allowing cross-domain clearing to directly use the same asset to circulate in different domains, reducing losses from 'forced liquidation.' This way, applications can design clearing, risk control, and collateral logic on a larger scale: for example, matching in domain A, clearing in domain B, and risk control in domain C, while the front-end user still sees a unified balance.
For market makers, this means that funds can circulate more efficiently, and the on-route costs of cross-domain transactions decrease; for protocols, this enhances the utilization of the TVL in the liquidity pool; for users, the experience is simply less hassle of 'swapping back and forth.'
The essence of ERA is to make assets truly public resources across domains. If data proves that cross-domain TVL, transaction volume, and liquidity utilization steadily increase, then ERA is not just a theoretical innovation, but a solid liquidity infrastructure. (It would indeed be very good if it can be confirmed)
$ERA #Caldera @Caldera Official